Showing posts with label Virginia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Virginia. Show all posts

Monday, April 25, 2011

Historical Image of the Day


Coal mining, near Richlands, Virginia, 1974.

I had originally intended this series of images to last a week or so, but with the sporadic posting, I've kind of kept it going. I'll close it here. This set of images I've used recently comes from the Environmental Protection Agency's amazing Documerica program. Between 1971 and 1977 (though mostly in 73 and 74), the EPA hired photographers to document environmental degradation, work conditions, and everyday life around the nation. You can check out the whole collection here, which I highly recommend.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Historical Image of the Day


Striking coal miners, Pittston Coal Strike, Virginia, 1989

Pittston was one of labor's biggest successes of the late 20th century,

Tuesday, January 04, 2011

"We Will Not Abandon Richmond"!!!!

The Museum of the Confederacy, which serves as the temple of Neo-Confederates and unreconstructed old school Confederates, is branching out to open a museum at Appomattox. Personally, I look forward to seeing their skewed view of Confederate surrender, i.e., the crushing of their treasonous rebellion in order to own, sell, rape, and kill black people. But what killed me is the link assuring the people of Richmond and Confederate wannabees more generally that "As We Create a System--We Will Not Abandon Richmond."

I love this language--the Museum is simply opening a new flank in the war against reasonable historical interpretation! They refuse to abandon Richmond to the idea that slavery caused the war and that people like Arthur Ashe and Martin Luther King deserve statues alongside Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson! That would be blasphemy!!!!

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Historical Image of the Day


Slave women processing pork, Wessyngton Plantation, Virginia

Saturday, October 09, 2010

Historical Image of the Day


Mildred and Richard Loving, the interracial couple who fought against Virginia's anti-interracial marriage laws, leading to the landmark Supreme Court case from 1967, Loving v. Virginia, which overthrew miscegenation laws.

Friday, September 17, 2010

Most Prominent Politicians From Each State (X): Virginia

Virginia's most powerful politicians not surprisingly come from the early years of the republic. I was somewhat struck at how hackish their politicians were in the late 19th and much of the 20th century. Also, although Woodrow Wilson was from Virginia, his political life was entirely in New Jersey, so he's there, not here.

1. George Washington--I rank him first because of his stabilizing influence over the country in its early days. I know Washington's star has fallen a bit in recent years, but he was important for who he was, irregardless of policies he made as president. His choice not to accept a lifetime appointment alone ranks him here.

2. Thomas Jefferson--Actually a pretty bad president, but so successful in the rest of his political life and in creating American ideology.

3. James Madison--he only wrote the Federalist Papers, was Jefferson's Secretary of State, and a 2 term president.

4. John Marshall--most important Supreme Court justice in history. Really created the Supreme Court as a legitimate institution.

5. James Monroe--an important figure of early America, even if he wasn't the most memorable president.

6. John Tyler--one of our worst presidents, Tyler significantly furthered the pro-slavery cause by hitching his political hopes for the 1844 election to southern extremists. Named John C. Calhoun Secretary of State, who proceeded to declare southern slavery expansion as the foundation of U.S. foreign and domestic policy. Good times.

7. Patrick Henry--core figure of the American Revolution and its immediate aftermath. Turned quite conservative in later years and became an ally of John Adams against Jefferson and Madison. Would have been more prominent in the early republic if, a) he had accepted Washington's offer as Secretary of State in 1795 and b) he hadn't died of stomach cancer in 1799.

8. Harry Byrd, Sr.--segregationist senator from 1933-65. Dominated the Democratic Party in Virginia during the mid-twentieth century. Opposed much of the New Deal and activist government policies more broadly. Leading segregationist. Received unsolicited electoral votes from southern voters opposed to both political parties in 1960.

9. Carter Glass--Secretary of the Treasury, 1918-20; Senator, 1920-46. White supremacist who openly advocated discrimination. Most remembered today for the Glass-Stegall Act, which has received much attention from people interested in banking reform today. That's fine, but let's not allow his sensible fiscal policies to cloud the fact that even for a man of his time and place he was a hell of a racebaiter.

10. Howard Smith--Congressman from 1931-67. Also a notorious racebaiter. Most famous for proposing protecting women under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as a way to undermine support for it. Because who thinks women should have equal rights.... Smith actually claimed that he was serious in supporting women's rights and he had some history here. However, I find it extremely hard to believe that he would add a women's rights clause to a bill he so vociferously opposed, and of course voted against. These were the years that Sam Rayburn dominated the House. A southerner himself, he worked to reduce Smith's power in Congress because of his racism. Yet other southern Congressmen always ensured Smith would speak for them.

Next: New York

Wednesday, June 02, 2010

Saturday, May 29, 2010

Wednesday, April 07, 2010

Bob McDonnell Loves Treason--So Long As It's To Enslave Black People

Being so busy, I've been a little late to the game of slamming Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell openly supporting Treason in Defense of Slavery by restarting the state's Confederate History month in April. I've always thought we should talk about April as Treason in Defense of Slavery Month. No one has furthered this more than McDonnell. The flack he's taken has been outstanding. And somewhat surprising I guess. But he's taken heat from everywhere, making an embarrassment of himself and his state.

Regardless of what McDonnell actually thinks about these issues, and actually he probably does believe this but whatever, it's clearly a cynical political maneuver. His Attorney General, who puts the "nut" in wingnut, has been getting ton of love on conservative circuits for leading the lawsuits against the health care bill. So McDonnell wanted to get attention of his own.

This is really pretty stupid because it alienates Virginia moderates. Virginia is such a swing state now that this kind of racist culture war stuff might play to the base, but it's going to be a disaster in general elections. I don't think the suburban Washington voters went for McDonnell because they love the Confederacy. Rather, it's this kind of foolishness that will help Obama win Virginia in 2012 and help doom Republicans in the state as demographics keep changing. I'm sure this will always be popular in the rural southwestern area of the state. In Alexandria, not so much.

The responses have been fantastic. Dave Noon, my long time compadre in Treason in Defense of Slavery discussions, quoted the South Carolina fireeater John Preston's speech at the Virginia secession convention in 1861, reminding us all what secession was about:

You may, as you are at this moment doing, centralize a coercive power at Washington stronger than the Praetorian bands when the Roman eagles shadowed the earth “from Lusitania to the Caucasus,” but you cannot come nearer coalescing the people of Virginia and the people of Vermont, the people of the St Lawrence and the people of the Gulf, than did Rome to make one of the Gaul and the Dacian, the Briton and the Ionian. No community of origin, no community of language, law or religion, can amalgamate a people whose severance is proclaimed by the rigid requisitions of material necessity. Nature forbids African slavery at the North. Southern civilization cannot exist without African slavery. None but an equal race can labor at the South. Destroy involuntary labor and Anglo Saxon civilization must be remitted to the latitudes whence it sprung.

Other historians are striking as well, including the dean of Civil War history, James McPherson.

As James McPherson, dean of Civil War scholars, commented on learning of Mr. McDonnell's proclamation: "I find it obnoxious, but it's extremely typical. The people that emphasize Confederate heritage and the legacy, and the importance of understanding Confederate history, want to deny that Confederate history was ultimately bound up with slavery. But that was the principal reason for secession -- that an anti-slavery party was elected to the White House. . . . And without secession, there wouldn't have been a war." 

Ouch.

McDonnell has backtracked big time, turning himself into a national embarrassment and pretty much killing his chances of ever being a serious nominee for the presidency. He stated in his defense:

"there were any number of aspects to that conflict between the states. Obviously, it involved slavery. It involved other issues. But I focused on the ones I thought were most significant for Virginia." 

Can I give you a bigger shovel Bob?  It's really helping you out to say that slavery wasn't important to Virginia history.

He's since apologized and added a recognition of slavery to his Confederate History Month proclamation. This has the double advantage of making him look like a backsliding jerk and pissing off the Sons of the Confederate Veterans. The latter is especially important because no organization fights harder to push a sanitized version of the Civil War that erases black people from the story (except for the 3 slaves or whatever who supposedly fought for the Confederacy that the SCV puts out there like the single black person on the stage at the Republican National Convention). This helps discredit their intentionally false view of history.

All in all then, this is a positive event. It again shows the racism of the Republican Party. It demonstrates both how far we've come from idealizing the Confederacy and how far we have to go. It's an important public discussion of our collective history. And it has tremendous political advantages for the Democrats. Win-win, except to remember that one of our political parties continues to embrace barely concealed racism.

Monday, January 18, 2010

Pro-Choice License Plates

Virginia Planned Parenthood's attempt to get pro-choice license plates in Virginia is a great idea whose time has come. I've often complained of the left ceding rhetoric to the right--"tax burden" and the like. In no place has this caused more damage than the pro-choice movement. Bill Clinton talking about abortion being "safe, legal, and rare," defends the principle of abortion, but not on the merits and as an unfortunate last resort. It's hard to rally people to defend a practice when your leaders won't even defend it vigorously. It allows anti-woman activists to claim that even pro-choice people don't really believe in the procedure and gives credence to their extremist rhetoric.

So something as small as a license plate is a step toward taking back the narrative.

Wednesday, May 06, 2009

Republicans: They Still Know How to Hate

I guess with the purging of moderates, the Republicans can be more open with their hate.

South Dakota senator John Thune opposes Obama naming a gay person as a Supreme Court judge.

But conservative leaders have warned the nomination of a gay or lesbian justice could complicate Obama’s effort to confirm a replacement for Souter, and another Republican senator on Wednesday warned a gay nominee would be too polarizing.

“I know the administration is being pushed, but I think it would be a bridge too far right now,” said GOP Chief Deputy Whip John Thune. “It seems to me this first pick is going to be a kind of important one, and my hope is that he'll play it a little more down the middle. A lot of people would react very negatively.”

I don't think this would be particularly polarizing. In fact, I don't think anything resembling a majority would care at all. With Maine today, 5 states have now have legalized gay marriage and we're probably looking at least 2 more (NH and NY), as well as Washington DC, by the end of the year. It would anger conservatives, but they are angry anyway. So who cares.

Meanwhile, Kos points us to this lovely ice cream flavor created by the Republican Women of Clifton (VA):

In Honor of the 44th President of the United States, Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream has issued a new flavor, ” Barocky Road.” Barocky Road is a blend of half Vanilla, half Chocolate, and surrounded by Nuts and Flakes. The Vanilla portion of the mix is not openly advertised and usually denied as an ingredient. The Nuts and Flakes are all very bitter and hard to swallow. The Cost is $100.00 per scoop.

When purchased, it will be presented to you in a large beautiful cone, but then the Ice Cream is taken away and given to the person in line behind you. Thus you are left with an empty Wallet, no change, holding an empty cone, with no hope of getting any Ice Cream.

Oh, that's just freaking hilarious...

And finally, it looks like Jeff Sessions (Segregationist-AL) will be the #2 ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, replacing Arlen Specter. What are Sessions' qualifications? Well, he once claimed the NAACP was a communist-inspired organization and a former subordinate said that Sessions liked the Ku Klux Klan, at least before he understood that some of their members liked to smoke pot. Which is the single worst reason to change your mind about the KKK that could possibly exist.

So yeah, the Republicans are really rocking the hate right now. This should really help them become relevant again!

Tuesday, May 05, 2009

Historical Image of the Day


This week's images come from the great online archive of the American eugenics movement. Check out the whole thing. They have some crazy stuff.

Brochure advertising Mongrel Virginians, a book about the horrors of miscegenation, 1926

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Friday, October 03, 2008

Go Dr. Ralph!

I am really surprised to hear that bluegrass legend Dr. Ralph Stanley is recording commercials for Barack Obama that will be shown in southwest Virginia. Bluegrass musicians are hardly known for their political liberalism, particularly those who grew up in Appalachia. For example, Ricky Skaggs was an active campaigner for Pat Robertson in 1988, when Skaggs had switched over to country and was one of the biggest music stars in the nation. Ira Louvin was a noted racist. Etc. Etc.

If I had ever thought about Stanley's political leanings, I just would have assumed he was a right-winger. But I guess I am wrong. He doesn't just Democrats, their race doesn't matter to him. And this from an old man from rural Virginia. Awesome.

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Tim Kaine and the Absurdity of Punditry

A lot of the VP speculation is now centering on Virginia Governor Tim Kaine. I have no particular problem with the man, though I don't know very much about him. I guess he has the advantage of being a young fresh face from a state that Obama has a very good chance of winning. I probably would be OK with the pick, though I'd really rather he pick a qualified woman like Janet Napolitano or Claire McCaskill.

But I find it laughable that every Democratic politician from the state of Virginia has to be a potential VP candidate. Hey pundits, I hear there is a city councilman from Richmond who hasn't been considered yet! Better get on it!

While Kaine, Warner, and Webb all have some advantages, the real reason they are being pushed by the punditry is that Virginia is the only conservative state any of them ever spend any time in. They think Obama needs a moderate to conservative state running mate. They know absolutely nothing about the South or the Mountain West. So they reflexively turn to Virginia. They can read about Virginia politicians in the Washington Post. They see their campaign ads on TV. And that's good enough for them.

Let's face it, pundits are lazy people. They go for cliche over analysis. They repeat the same themes ad nauseum. They make overaching claims for small events. They don't want to have to work to come up with their talking points. That might take time away from their dinner parties. So they turn to what's easy. For VP speculation, the easy way out is Virginia politicians. And thus we have the attention on Tim Kaine.

In other news, Trapper John over at Kos is guessing that Obama will pick Tom Daschle. This is, um, strange, but I guess plausible enough. It would solve the supposed experience problem. Trapper John is right that the VP selection here isn't going to make much difference since the election is all about Obama. He calls Daschle a Cheney-like selection, which I guess is true. But if Daschle is as inspiring as he was when he was the Democratic leader in the Senate, I guess the VP debates will be a good time for a nap.

Thursday, June 05, 2008

Historical Image of the Day


Nurses and officers of the U.S. Sanitary Commission, a group that worked to bring sanitary conditions to Civil War army camps. Fredericksburg, Virginia, May 1864

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Historical Image of the Day


First graduating class of Virginia Normal and Collegiate Institute, 1886. This school became Virginia State University, a traditionally black college.

Saturday, May 17, 2008

An eerie start

I am in Norfolk, Virginia this month for rehearsals and a performance of part of my new opera at the Virginia Arts Festival. The work, Heroes, Monsters, Humans, deals with the Iraq War from the perspectives of, by turns, a young Iraqi girl, an American soldier, and his wife back home in the States. The work is, as my stage works tend to be lately, political in nature (last year, the Arts Festival performed scenes from my comic opera, The Most Fortunate Son, which is a satirical critique of class privilege in America, as told through the ascendancy of George W. Bush).

In any event, this trip has been framed by two very different and very poignant experiences. While flying from Atlanta to Norfolk (which is a large Navy town), I sat by a 22 year old returning from Iraq for fifteen days of leave. We talked for the whole hour of the trip; he had been flown from Iraq to Germany to Ireland to Atlanta to Norfolk, a trip that had taken him almost three days. He is stationed in Southern Iraq, where things are calmer. His perspective was interesting; he had volunteered for duty in Iraq because of the money (he is paid more over there for hazard pay), and made a point to say that he wasn’t “tied up” in all of the “other stuff”—meaning the politics. I imagine it would be a great benefit for one to have that kind of disengagement, which he extended to the dangers of his work there as well. He told me that driving around those roads, he just thinks of them like normal highways, not letting his mind think about the risks.

As we got off the plane, I asked him what he was planning on doing on leave. He said he was going to drink beer and go camping. Camping would be the last damn thing I’d want to do after living in tent in Iraq for the last seven months, and I think he picked up on my amazement. He said, “I want to be near some trees”.

Talk about taking things in my life for granted.

Three fun things I learned from him:

(1) There is no alcohol in Iraq

(2) Everything there smells like shit and diesel

(3) It takes the Navy over three days to get you from Iraq to the States; it takes them 18 hours to get you from the States to Iraq

After arriving and checking into the hotel here, I stepped outside to try to find a place to eat lunch. As I was looking around, a young man standing outside the hotel looked at me and just started talking. The first thing he said was “What the fuck are you looking at?”, which left me rather stunned. As we began to talk, his hostility left as quickly as it had come.

His name was Kevin, 23 years old, also in the Navy. There was something haltingly wrong with him—drugs, alcohol, PTSD, I have no idea—but something was very wrong. He would begin to talk about his inability to say things, vague language about hiding things, and various other secretive and veritably strange phrases. He started crying at one point, and then immediately smiled and told me the bag I was carrying made me look like a “fag”. It was the strangest conversation I have ever had in my entire life. It was like an emotional rampage—up, down, angry, sad, defeated, aggressive—all in the span of about half an hour. Even stranger was that his language was so vague. He said very little that was not abstracted, and several times offered me cryptic advice about secrecy (?!) I cannot capture the nature of this conversation very well, but suffice is to say it was very odd, frightening, and in a way, moving.

These experiences would have been very poignant in their own right, but having them as the first experiences of this trip, which is centered on my Iraq War opera, is a very strange feeling. It somehow seems fitting.