Showing posts with label Peabrains Posing as Pundits. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Peabrains Posing as Pundits. Show all posts

Thursday, July 08, 2010

Why Presidents Do Things

Jamelle Bouie slams on this utterly insipid Howard Fineman column.

Fineman is trying to figure out why Obama is doing things. He just can't understand why he would try to reform so much so fast. Why would he take on health care and the economy and Afghanistan and arms treaties and immigration and energy? Of course the real question from Fineman or David Brooks or David Broder is always, "Why would a president move on anything without consensus from the pundit class?"

Fineman surmises that Obama is primarily concerned with his place in history. While there's probably a smidgen of truth in this, Fineman completely misses the real reason why Obama is doing so much:

Because this country was really fucked up after 8 years of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and the gang.

Isn't that why Obama was elected? I may disagree with the moderation of his changes and his ways of trying to get things done, but that he is trying to create change isn't because he wants to go down in history. It's because this country needs reform in just about every sector.

I realize that Fineman and others think politics is a big game. But I really don't think Obama thinks this way at all. He is trying to put the country back on the right track after it went really, really off the rails. Even if you hate Obama, isn't it blindingly obvious that he's acting because he thinks the country is screwed up?

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Inane Punditry

Vote today in the Media Matters poll of the year's most inane punditry.

I voted for Cokie Roberts attacking Obama for vacationing in Hawaii because it was foreign, but there are so many good choices.

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

Election Gossip

A few other people have linked to this, but check out this great insider info from the campaigns that Newsweek is publishing.

Among the highlights:

The debates unnerved both candidates. When he was preparing for them during the Democratic primaries, Obama was recorded saying, "I don't consider this to be a good format for me, which makes me more cautious. I often find myself trapped by the questions and thinking to myself, 'You know, this is a stupid question, but let me … answer it.' So when Brian Williams is asking me about what's a personal thing that you've done [that's green], and I say, you know, 'Well, I planted a bunch of trees.' And he says, 'I'm talking about personal.' What I'm thinking in my head is, 'Well, the truth is, Brian, we can't solve global warming because I f---ing changed light bulbs in my house. It's because of something collective'."

You do have to wonder how the candidates put up with this shit. And did Brian Williams actually think that was a good question? The punditocracy is not the best and the brightest, though they certainly think that about themselves.

McCain also was reluctant to use Obama's incendiary pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, as a campaign issue. The Republican had set firm boundaries: no Jeremiah Wright; no attacking Michelle Obama; no attacking Obama for not serving in the military. McCain balked at an ad using images of children that suggested that Obama might not protect them from terrorism. Schmidt vetoed ads suggesting that Obama was soft on crime (no Willie Hortons). And before word even got to McCain, Schmidt and Salter scuttled a "celebrity" ad of Obama dancing with talk-show host Ellen DeGeneres (the sight of a black man dancing with a lesbian was deemed too provocative).

I'm not buying into the rehabilitation of McCain's reputation that he and so many others are already engaging in. However, is their any doubt that Bush and Rove (or Lee Atwater for that matter) would have used this stuff all the way? Although I would not call McCain's campaign classy in any way, it could have been worse.

NEWSWEEK has also learned that Palin's shopping spree at high-end department stores was more extensive than previously reported. While publicly supporting Palin, McCain's top advisers privately fumed at what they regarded as her outrageous profligacy. One senior aide said that Nicolle Wallace had told Palin to buy three suits for the convention and hire a stylist. But instead, the vice presidential nominee began buying for herself and her family—clothes and accessories from top stores such as Saks Fifth Avenue and Neiman Marcus. According to two knowledgeable sources, a vast majority of the clothes were bought by a wealthy donor, who was shocked when he got the bill. Palin also used low-level staffers to buy some of the clothes on their credit cards. The McCain campaign found out last week when the aides sought reimbursement. One aide estimated that she spent "tens of thousands" more than the reported $150,000, and that $20,000 to $40,000 went to buy clothes for her husband. Some articles of clothing have apparently been lost. An angry aide characterized the shopping spree as "Wasilla hillbillies looting Neiman Marcus from coast to coast," and said the truth will eventually come out when the Republican Party audits its books.

McCain himself rarely spoke to Palin during the campaign, and aides kept him in the dark about the details of her spending on clothes because they were sure he would be offended. Palin asked to speak along with McCain at his Arizona concession speech Tuesday night, but campaign strategist Steve Schmidt vetoed the request.
This stuff is hilarious. Wasilla hillbillies looting Neiman Marcus. Wow. There sure is a lot of hatred of Palin coming from the McCain team.

Newsweek is promising more of this kind of thing. It's quality insider gossip.

Wednesday, September 03, 2008

Palin Speech Prognostication

My prediction:

No matter what Palin says tonight, good or bad, at least 1 conservative commentator will call it her Checkers speech and say that it saved her candidacy. I guarantee you that comparison will be made.

Wednesday, January 02, 2008

Chuck Norris: The Key to the GOP Nomination

What's more ridiculous than a Republican candidate who thinks he's "cool?" You guessed it. That Huckabee really believes that Chuck Norris will help his campaign. This funny little story about a Norris/Huckabee rally a couple of nights ago really says it well. I guess the line of reasoning for his inclusion in the campaigning is a three step process. First, Chuck Norris is a right wing scumbag. Second, Huckabee heard some young people make some stupid Chuck Norris joke, which are all too plentiful and not very funny. Finally, a light goes on in Huckabee's little brain: "Eureka! Norris can help me connect with the youth of America!" And so Norris is on the campaign trail. I defy any of this "weird group of teenagers who were unusually excited about abolishing the IRS" to watch Braddock: Missing in Action 3 and tell me that this is the man we want to listen to. Peabrains beget peabrains though, so what can I say?