Monday, September 18, 2006

Bathroom Etiquette

I don't know what the fuck the problem is with men but why are men's bathrooms always so disgusting? What is the deal with us? My particular complaint are the people who throw a half a roll of toilet paper down with them, thus clogging the whole thing and making a grotesque mess. Who does these things? Why? Graffiti in stalls and peeing on floors are other issues that I won't even touch now.

I wish we could find out who does this, line them up, and slap them silly. Where's the fucking panopticon when you need it?

God Bless You Willie

Willie Nelson busted for drugs. Bummer.

This reminds me of the time I saw Willie interviewed on 60 Minutes. As you may know, he was once caught smoking pot on the White House roof when he was visiting his friend Jimmy Carter. When asked if he regretted it, he simply said he regretted the embarrassment that his friend President Carter suffered.

Sunday, September 17, 2006

NCAA Top 25, Week 4

1. Ohio St. Good job beating Cincinnati in the Cornhole Bowl.

2. West Virginia

3. Florida

4. Auburn--Another exciting SEC game. Auburn 7, LSU 3. Why even have an offense?

5. USC

6. Michigan. Crushed Notre Dame. Couldn't be happier

7. Oregon. My Ducks had the luckiest win ever. Thanks Refs!

8. Louisville. Destroyed Miami. Don't know how they keep winning with all of these injuries. But for now, go Cardinals.

9. Texas

10. LSU. It's called an offense. Try it.

11. Virginia Tech

12. TCU--Held Texas Tech to 3 points. Very good team.

13. Oklahoma. Can't drop them too far for a game that the refs helped lose for them.

14. Georgia

15. California

16. Notre Dame. So sad.

17. Tennessee

18. Iowa. Whatever.

19. Arizona St.

20. Florida St. They should probably be lower.

21. Clemson

22. UCLA

23. Missouri

24. Boston College. If you think Oregon is the luckiest team in the nation, think again.

25. Wisconsin

Close: Penn St. (out of a lack of good options more than anything.), Alabama (still on the cusp), Nebraska (probably shouldn't drop them too far for losing to USC but I just don't think they're that good), Rutgers (still hanging on), Texas Tech (their loss was more a reflection of TCU's quality than there probable rightful spot as a borderline top 25 team).

UPDATE (9/18)--I just realized I forgot about Boise St. Put Boise St. at #20 and drop the rest down one spot. In any case, Wisconsin is barely deserving, having put up a whopping 14 points on the mighty San Diego St. Aztecs.

Saturday, September 16, 2006

Brillant!

This article from MSN argues that bad habits are good for your career.

Among the bad habits that are good for your career: gambling

What could possibly go wrong?!?!

Friday, September 15, 2006

Lyrad's Random 10

Finally, some Ennio Morricone...it's about damn time

1. Painkiller--Scud Attack
2. Pink Floyd--Brain Damage
3. Zamir Chorale of Boston--Maoz Tsur (Traditional Chanukah chant)
4. Miles Davis--Flamenco Sketches
5. T. Rex--Buick MacKane
6. Ennio Morricone--Death of a Spider (from The Good, the Bad and the Ugly)
7. Nickel Creek--Robin and Marion
8. Leonard Bernstein--Candide (Overture)
9. Michael Terzis--A Mermaid on the Boat (Traditional Greek)
10. Tom Waites--When You Ain't Got Nobody

You Mean That Illegal Immigrants Are Keeping Small Towns Alive? Who Knew!

From the home of the vomit-inducing Lou Dobbs comes this excellent story about how the deportation of illegal immigrants from Stillmore, Georgia has eviscerated the town. Without the immigrants, there is nothing happening there at all. Businesses are closing.

We shouldn't glean too much from this but I did find this quote interesting: "These people come over here to make a better way of life, not to blow us up," complained Keith Slater, who keeps a portrait of Ronald Reagan on the wall. "I'm a die-hard Republican, but I think we missed the boat with this one."

I doubt that rural Americans are going to come out en masse for immigrant rights but let's face it, when your town dies overnight because good, hard-working people are rounded up like they were terrorists, that might just change your mind about immigration.

No doubt Lou Dobbs will reply by talking about how these Mexican terrorists were planning undermine rural Georgian culture with their Catholicism and work and brown skin and such.

The Best and the Brightest

Check out this excellent summary of the recruiting problems of the US military from Asia Times.

Among other points:

1. Between 2004 and 2005, the numbers of military recruits who had committed serious crimes rose by 54%.

2. Recruiting in youth prisons.

3. Recruiting straight out of urban gangs.

4. Recruiting among neo-Nazi groups.

The American military--the few and the proud.

The Dangers of Teaching, Part 4

While I did manage to keep my pants zipped up yesterday evening, I had some issues with an eraser.

First off, this classroom has some serious chalk issues and I was forced to use purple chalk, thus of course imperiling my manhood. I made a joke about the purple chalk and my manhood to the class but no one got it. Surprisingly 18 year olds have a limited ability to get my masculinity and whiteness jokes. Wonder why.

Anyway, after class I am erasing the board and my eraser hits the border between the two halves the board and hits me in the chest, leaving a large purple mark on my shirt. Then I pick it up and go back to erasing the same spot. Within 1 second the same thing happens, except it hits me in the glasses.

So basically I was beaten up by an eraser.

Erik's Random 10

1. Steve Earle, The Gringo's Tale
2. Rodney Crowell, Highway 17
3. Frank Zappa, Rat Tomago
4. Dave Alvin, Nine Volt Heart
5. Jello Biafra & Mojo Nixon, Where Are We Gonna Work (When The Trees Are Gone)
6. Johnny Cash, Why Me Lord?
7. Tom Russell, Seven Curses
8. Jim & Jennie & The Pinetops, Mt. St. Helens
9. Sufjan Stevens, The Tallest Man, the Broadest Shoulders
10. Roger Miller, Chug A Lug

Mister Trend's Random 10

As I get ready to go to a weekend of wedding-related events for a friend (stupid Cincinnati....more on that later, I'm sure), here's my random 10:

1. "Please Stand Up" - British Sea Power
2. "Forty Days and Forty Nights" - Muddy Waters
3. "Lion's Jaws" - Neko Case
4. "Mayfair" - Nick Drake
5. "Bitter Tears" - The Magnetic Fields
6. "Dirty Dream No. 2" - Belle & Sebastian
7. "A Way of Life" - The Concretes
8. "Johnny Come Home" - Isobel Campbell
9. "Mellow Down Easy" - Little Walter
10. "Michael Jackson" - Fatboy Slim

Thursday, September 14, 2006

Unsung Giants of Modern Music (III): Carl Stalling

Growing up, like most children of my generation, I was crazy for Saturday morning cartoons. Whether it was The Snorks, Monchichi, or Laugh-a-lympics, I was obsessed. For what reasons, I can’t say, the greater majority of cartoons from the era were garbage. But, the saving grace of the cartoons at this time (and I knew they were better then), despite the fact that they were fifty years old, were the Warner Bros. cartoons, the Looney Tunes. The animation was basic and understandable, the characters were fun (even if I couldn’t get the extent of their references), and the kinetic action was more violent than other cartoons of the time. The part of these shorts, however, though I wouldn’t come to understand until much later though, that sets these apart from anything produced before or since is the music, written and conducted by Carl Stalling, a maverick and forward-looking artist who has rarely, if ever, been matched in style or tone.

Stalling began his career in the early 1920s as an organist and small orchestra conductor at a local theater in Kansas City accompanying silent film. This would clearly have a great influence on him and, in the mid-‘20s, he got together with a young Walt Disney to write music for Disney’s early sound cartoons. Stalling developed the Silly Symphonies series with Disney but, in 1936, was wooed away to Warner Brothers, which was beginning to include cartoons before their films and he became their number one full-time animation composer. For Warner Bros, Stalling produced scores for more than 600 cartoons over both the Merrie Melodies and Looney Tunes monikers between 1936 and his retirement in 1958. This averages over 27 scores per year over his entire career, which makes him one of the most prolific composers of the 20th century.

He wrote his compositions at the same frenetic pace as both the tempo of the music and the action on screen and, in fact, the cartoons were contrived with what were called “click tracks,” that is, physical marks made on the film to act as a kind of metronome that indicated where changes would occur in the music. Stalling has been (dubiously) credited with the invention of the click track, though this is likely not the case. Still, the changes in the music happen at a rate that foreshadowed the tape and computer music that would become popular in avant-garde circles in the 1950s and 60s as well as some of the extreme jazz that has arisen in recent years.

Stalling has been in the public eye (or ear) consistently on television for 40 years, if innocuously behind the scenes, giving three generations of cartoon fans an education in jazz, classical, and folk music that they never asked for. How many people hear and recognize Raymond Scott’s “Powerhouse,” Edvard Grieg’s “Morning Mood,” or the traditional “Little Brown Jug” even if they’ve never been told what the song is? The recognition is instant and, moreover, the recognition is directly tied to an image. “Powerhouse” represents industrial action, “Morning Music” (obviously) represents waking up and stretching, and “Little Brown Jug” represents drunks. These songs, and a mind-boggling number of others, are referenced throughout the catalogue by what Stalling called “musical puns,” in which he would insert snippets of songs both classic and modern into his original music. For him and his original audience, these references would have been more instantly recognized for what they were than they are now, but it would be the same if a film composer added a few notes from “Sweet Child ‘O Mine” for no reason other than the association that it would bring and the comment it would add to the action onscreen. This was unprecedented at the time but, more than that, has never been repeated in mainstream soundtracks or popular music. The technique is occasionally used by John Zorn in his “Naked City” and “Spillane” projects, and by Mike Patton in his work with Fantomas, but this usage is a direct reference by artists who site Stalling as a huge influence. DJ’s, of course, use the method consistently, though it’s hard to say whether there is any direct correlation or a happy coincidence that always helped me greatly in accessing the style. Often unmentioned is his ability, beyond the borrowings, to write masterful and timeless themes for the onscreen characters that are worthy of any film composer at any time. His method in this has its roots in opera, where each principle character would have his or her own key and melody and where changes in key in relation to the action would indicate changes in the character.

All of this gels into one of the most unique composers of the 20th century. Unfortunately, bare recordings of most of his scores are non-existent. The sum of his work on CD encompasses a grand total of two releases. TWO!!!!! Only one of these contains any full scores, the other being mostly montages, medleys, and studio footage (interesting, but not very telling of the greatness of the final product). I had hoped for years that more volumes of The Carl Stalling Project would be released, but have since given up. It’s an interesting experiment, on this note, to try and both watch the cartoons without the sound and the music without the visuals. In the former, the cartoons are decidedly less funny and sometimes unwatchable. In the latter, the music becomes wackier, more frenetic and, in many ways, much more profound as, like many great film compositions, the expressions present in the music allows the mind to build images that cannot exist when given direct visual reference.

More Must-Not-See TV...

I know I'm not the first to talk about her, and I'm certainly one of legions who hate her, but the new story concerning a mother's suicide in the wake of her appearance on Nancy Grace is just the lowest of the low. I've been misfortunate enough to catch Grace in blurbs while flipping the channels, and she represents the absolute worst of television. Her aggressive style is painful, and her narrowmindedness and absolute belief she is right without any thought processes whatsoever rivals that of the fiercest wingnuts (if you've never seen her, think a female James Dobson in the legal world, and you begin to understand). To put it in the vernacular, she's bad-crazy.

However, the latest story is the most appalling, and indicative of her approach to law generally, and unfortunately, reflects media attitudes towards the legal process more generally. The moment there's an accusation anywhere, from the most obscure case to the Michael Jackson case of last year, she, as a former prosecutor, is immediately confident of the undeniable guilt of said person. Legal process? What legal process? Nancy Grace KNOWS the bastard is guilty!

There are a couple of broader problems here, too. She does nothing to prevent the sectors of society who watch her to actually consider the whole notion of "innocent until proven guilty." What's worse, she basically undermines the Constitution - it's no longer a trial by a jury of your peers, but a trial by Nancy Grace on national television. And worst, in the wake of this story, she's completely incalcitrant or remorseful or even backing down from her attitude, which very well may have led to this young woman's suicide.

And perhaps the saddest part is, at least she doesn't pretend to believe in innocence until proven guilty. All too often, from the Lindbergh baby to OJ to Michael Jackson, all the media partakes in the "prosecution and guilt as determined by the media." At least Grace doesn't even bother giving the sixth amendment superficial lip service before launching into her public hanging, like the rest of the press, who always insist on said innocence before basically condemning before there can even be an indictment handed down (see the recent JonBenet Ramsey failure, and the indictment in the press of Karr before he'd even left Thailand). Grace has no pretext.

Is the media solely to blame? No. People are willing to condemn, too, but one must wonder (in a legal "chicken or egg" scenario) how much of it is the media seizing upon the public's emotion, and how much is the media stoking the public's emotions on legal cases of the famous.

I couldn't care less about Nancy Grace. I hate her with the hatred I have for the New York Yankees, it's that bad. And all this just makes me more depressed...

Shame on the media. Shame on her viewers. And Shame on you, Nancy Grace.

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Must Not See TV

Well, this seems avoidable. Andrew Lloyd Webber on television picking the lead for his new opera in a reality show. Hmmm. If I commit suicide over the next few months, rest assured it is because I accidentally ran across this on the television. Thank God I don't live in England or this might actually happen.

Democracy in Brazil

While few in America would even know, Brazil (a country larger than the continental U.S.) is heading towards its presidential elections on October 1, with Luis Inacio "Lula" da Silva of the PT (Partido dos Trabaladores, or Workers' Party) seeking reelection against Geraldo Alckmin of the PSDB, or Partido Social Democratico Brazileiro (Brazilian Social Democratic Party) (which, despite the NY Times' labeling, is NOT center left, but rather center-right - the political spectrum in Brazil is naturally radically different than that here, and thus, a little harder for some journalists stuck in the American way of imagining politics to wrap their minds around).

However, in the past several months, the campaign has gotten interesting. A third candidate, Heloisa Helena Lima de Moraes (known affectionately as "HH") of the newly-formed PSOL (Partido Socialismo e Liberdade - Socialism and Liberty Party) has emerged. She stands no chance of winning - her ratings hover between 9-15 percent, compared to the lower-20s for Alckmin and the mid-upper 40s for Lula. However, what is fascinating is she was a member of the PT until 2003, when she was expelled for being maverick, and has formed her own party that challenges Lula's administration. It has certainly made for some fascinating times in the campaigning process in Brazil.

However, the NY Times story on her today rests upon some flawed assumptions and notions. It analyzes her as a politician and provides a background on her personal history and beliefs. However, it assumes that her campaign will damage Lula's. In Brazil, if a candidate does not get 50% of the vote (due to many parties running), there is a run-off between the two top vote-getters. Thus, as it stands right now and has stood for awhile, Lula does face the very real probability of a run-off.

However, to presume that he would automatically lose such a run-off, or that it would be really difficult, is flawed. Certainly, a run-off (should there be one - you never know the way of the voters until the votes are count) would be a different matter than a multi-party election. But what the article today neglects to take into account is how people would then vote in a run-0ff in Brazil. Many people have said they will vote for HH, but if there's a run-off, Lula will get their votes. Basically, a Lula-Alckmin runoff (which, again, looks likely) will turn into a "vote for lesser of two evils" vote, and the history of the PSDB in increasing the wage gap in Brazil and their horrible subservience to the United States in a neoliberal policy (which wracked Brazil from 1994-2002 under the corrupt administration of Fernando Henrique Cardoso), combined with Alckmin's completely non-charismatic character, will still probably give Lula the vote. People who vote for Alckmin in the first round will vote for him in the second, while the chance of somebody voting for HH in the first and then supporting Alckmin over Lula is virtually non-existant. Not only this, the NY Times reporter did not do his research. While HH's support has risen from 2% earlier this summer to about 11% now, Lula's support has remained around the 44-49% range. It's Alckmin's approval that has dropped, from 29% earlier to a sparse 22% just a few weeks ago.

It's nice to see any coverage of the Brazilian presidential campaign in the U.S. press at all. However, today's article reminds us that it must be taken as a grain of salt, offering an unfortunate example from one of the country's best newspapers that perceptions and understandings of other countries's political processes and situations are still painfully inadequate.

Ah, the British Music Press

In the United States, there's a tendency to totally not understand the British music hype machine. While we have certainly benefited from some groups gaining enough hype (without England, there wouldn't have been much buzz in the U.S. for groups like the Pixies, the Breeders, White Stripes and the Strokes, even though they were home-grown bands). However, then there are other acts like everything-Libertines related, the Smiths, Kasabian, and Oasis, where the hype is grand, and Americans are left scratching their heads, saying, "huh?"

However, there is a new reason to feel a degree of contempt towards the British music press today. NME, the leader of British hype, reviews the new Mars Volta CD, "Amputechture." It laments the difficulty of the album, and while it may end up being pretentious or uninteresting (I haven't heard it yet), the review laments the shift from prog rock towards free jazz, complaining that "Nothing good ever came of free jazz."

Oh, and Oasis, the Spice Girls, Wham!, and others were cultural landmarks, demonstrating a high new art form?

I just find such petty complaints stupid in music. Just because it doesn't sound like what you expect doesn't mean it's bad. And as a "free jazz" (whatever that is) fan, the reviewer doesn't know what he's talking about. Obviously, everyone can cite John Coltrane's later work, which is my favorite of his (see especially "Ascension," "Meditations," and "Interstellar Space"), artists like Ornette Coleman, Joe McPhee, William Parker (thanks to Erik to introducing me to him), Rashied Ali, William Hooker, Matthew Shipp, Wayne Horvitz, and numerous others have done remarkable things with what has become "free jazz." I'm willing to wager that the music of these men (leading to an interesting question - where are the women?) is far more interesting, important, and intelligent than most of the British exports to the U.S. over the last 25 years.

So note to NME: get out of your box and consider music can be good beyond the expectations and genre-limits you impose upon it. After all, artists like Shipp and Horvitz are far more worthy of the hype you generally give to far more mediocre bands.

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Uruguay

There's an interesting article in the NY Times from today discussing Uruguay's role in the competition for Latin American alliances between Venezuela and the United States. There are a couple of interesting facets this article points us to. First of all, there is the fact that while Clinton and his predecessors get fair share of blame for neoliberal policies that attempt to get "third world" (a term I loathe) countries into subservient positions with the U.S. via free trade agreements, such policies, while lost in the rhetoric of the war on terror, have not disappeared during the Bush administration. Rather, we continue like drones, pushing neoliberalism, despite the clear failures in Brazil and Argentina as well as lesser failures in Mexico and elsewhere in the Americas, blaming those countries instead of the inherent flaws of neoliberalism, and continuing to exploit the hell out of anybody we can in the name of multinational business.

Additionally, the article points to nuances and complexities of South American politics, and "third world" politics at the international level more broadly. Whether we want to or not, we often tend to imagine the world along the axis of U.S./Europe and "third world", but there's such diversity between different nation-states too, and complexities of "Third World" politics go very far beyond anything the term or idea of a "third world" offers. As obvious as it may seem, the article points out the differences between somewhere like Uruguay vs. somewhere like Brazil, Argentina, or Venezuela, and its an important difference that we all too often neglect.

Finally, in a reminder that hits closer to home for Mister Trend, the article offers an important contemporary reminder even to those individuals interested in Latin American history, politics, policy, human rights, etc., that there's more than Chile, Argentina, Mexico, Brazil, and Venezuela.

Well, That's One More Fulbright Than I'll Ever Get

Congratulations to Mr. Trend for getting a Fulbright-Hays fellowship for his study of crack whores in Brazil. I'm sure the field research will be tough.

What's that Mr. Trend, you're not researching crack whores? Oh, I'm sorry. I misunderstood. That's just what you'll be spending the US government's money on.

Quite a new thing, having someone smart on this blog.

Tuesday Forgotten American Blogging--Popé

In 1598, the Spanish in their infinite wisdom and kindness, decided to come north to settle what became New Mexico. Certain that the region was loaded with cities made of gold and silver that they could use to fund their slaughter of Protestants in Holland and Britain, the Spanish found nothing. I know it is shocking to the modern observer, but the Indian pueblos at Zuni were not in fact made of gold. If adobe was currency, the Spanish could have fought the counterreformation forever but unfortunately for them, it's not.

They then settled for what was in New Mexico--Indian labor and heathen souls. Between 1598 and 1680 the Spanish engaged in an intensive exploitation of the region's people for their own purposes. Juan de Oñate and the other Spaniards who came to New Mexico were less than pleased that New Mexico offered them so little so they brutually used what was there. The Spaniards brought with them several Franciscan monks who used the gentle methods pioneered by their spiritual ancestor St. Francis of Assisi when he converted the birds to Christ to torture and murder Indians who refused the Christian god.

By the late 17th century, the Pueblo peoples had enough. In 1680, they revolted, murdering and mutilating the bodies of the Franciscans and driving the Spanish back to El Paso. This revolt was led by Popé. Popé, a member of the San Juan people, was named by the Spaniards who survived as the leader. They said that he coordinated the whole thing, sending a knotted rope between each of the Pueblos. Each Pueblo untied one knot and when the last one was untied, the revolt would commence.

It is impossible to know how accurate this portrayal of Popé is. Most Spanish documents were destroyed in the Revolt and even those who made it to El Paso had only a minimal idea of just what happened. But I discuss Popé for 2 reasons. He is representative of the Pueblo Revolt and the thousands of brave Puebloans who risked their lives to throw off the Spanish yoke. But I also mention Popé because of the way that some historians have denigrated him over the years. The worst is the early dean of New Mexico history, Angélico Chávez. Chávez, a Franciscan himself, claimed that there was no way Popé could have led the revolt and instead pointed to Dominigo Naranjo, a mestizo as the leader. His reason--that an Indian couldn't possibly lead such an action. Chávez is representative of the racism that people who claim pure Spanish heritage, a myth as richly hilarious as the myth of the Noble Confederacy, use against Indians even today. Those who claim Spanish heritage still see themselves as the elites of New Mexico and use their supposed pure blood to claim special status within society.

By the time the Spanish returned in 1692, Popé was dead. A zealot who believed that all vestiges of Spanish culture should be eliminated, including horses, Old World crops, and iron tools, he was likely assassinated by enemies who thought he went too far. Like the rest of the world, the Pueblo people liked stuff, even if it was Spanish.

The Dangers of Teaching, Part 3

Just a note here--when you discover 2/3 of the way through your class that your fly is open, you know things have gone wrong.

NCAA Top 25, Week 3

1. Ohio St.-- As if there was any question

2. West Virginia

3. Florida

4. Auburn

5. LSU--Probably should be ranked higher given how they crushed Arizona

6. USC

7. Notre Dame--I still don't think they're really that good. But they did destroy Penn St. I really think that's more a factor of Penn St. being vastly overrated but I guess I have to wait for Michigan to beat Notre Dame to reflect that in my rankings.

8. Michigan

9. Oregon. My Ducks survived the snake pit that is Fresno St in Fresno. Now they have Oklahoma at home. I can't wait.

10. Tennessee. Looked terrible against Air Force but they won so I guess that's what matters.

11. Oklahoma. See the description for Tennessee.

12. Louisville

13. Texas. Probably too far of a drop but with a freshman QB, I really see them losing additional games.

14. Virginia Tech

15. TCU

16. Georgia

17. Florida St.--This is a bad team that happens to be 2-0

18. Cal--Nice win over Minnesota after the Tennessee disaster

19. Iowa--Beat Syracuse in 2OT. Great.

20. Miami

21. Arizona St.

22. Boise St.--totally dominated Oregon St.

23. Nebraska

24. Texas Tech

25. UCLA

Close--Clemson (tough loss to BC but they should be OK), Missouri (2-0 and dominated Mississippi), Alabama (2-0 but unimpressive), Boston College (not really convinced yet but it was a nice win over Clemson), Rutgers (in a weak conference this team could actually compete. Though I can't believe I'm saying this).