Wednesday, November 05, 2008

Election Gossip

A few other people have linked to this, but check out this great insider info from the campaigns that Newsweek is publishing.

Among the highlights:

The debates unnerved both candidates. When he was preparing for them during the Democratic primaries, Obama was recorded saying, "I don't consider this to be a good format for me, which makes me more cautious. I often find myself trapped by the questions and thinking to myself, 'You know, this is a stupid question, but let me … answer it.' So when Brian Williams is asking me about what's a personal thing that you've done [that's green], and I say, you know, 'Well, I planted a bunch of trees.' And he says, 'I'm talking about personal.' What I'm thinking in my head is, 'Well, the truth is, Brian, we can't solve global warming because I f---ing changed light bulbs in my house. It's because of something collective'."

You do have to wonder how the candidates put up with this shit. And did Brian Williams actually think that was a good question? The punditocracy is not the best and the brightest, though they certainly think that about themselves.

McCain also was reluctant to use Obama's incendiary pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, as a campaign issue. The Republican had set firm boundaries: no Jeremiah Wright; no attacking Michelle Obama; no attacking Obama for not serving in the military. McCain balked at an ad using images of children that suggested that Obama might not protect them from terrorism. Schmidt vetoed ads suggesting that Obama was soft on crime (no Willie Hortons). And before word even got to McCain, Schmidt and Salter scuttled a "celebrity" ad of Obama dancing with talk-show host Ellen DeGeneres (the sight of a black man dancing with a lesbian was deemed too provocative).

I'm not buying into the rehabilitation of McCain's reputation that he and so many others are already engaging in. However, is their any doubt that Bush and Rove (or Lee Atwater for that matter) would have used this stuff all the way? Although I would not call McCain's campaign classy in any way, it could have been worse.

NEWSWEEK has also learned that Palin's shopping spree at high-end department stores was more extensive than previously reported. While publicly supporting Palin, McCain's top advisers privately fumed at what they regarded as her outrageous profligacy. One senior aide said that Nicolle Wallace had told Palin to buy three suits for the convention and hire a stylist. But instead, the vice presidential nominee began buying for herself and her family—clothes and accessories from top stores such as Saks Fifth Avenue and Neiman Marcus. According to two knowledgeable sources, a vast majority of the clothes were bought by a wealthy donor, who was shocked when he got the bill. Palin also used low-level staffers to buy some of the clothes on their credit cards. The McCain campaign found out last week when the aides sought reimbursement. One aide estimated that she spent "tens of thousands" more than the reported $150,000, and that $20,000 to $40,000 went to buy clothes for her husband. Some articles of clothing have apparently been lost. An angry aide characterized the shopping spree as "Wasilla hillbillies looting Neiman Marcus from coast to coast," and said the truth will eventually come out when the Republican Party audits its books.

McCain himself rarely spoke to Palin during the campaign, and aides kept him in the dark about the details of her spending on clothes because they were sure he would be offended. Palin asked to speak along with McCain at his Arizona concession speech Tuesday night, but campaign strategist Steve Schmidt vetoed the request.
This stuff is hilarious. Wasilla hillbillies looting Neiman Marcus. Wow. There sure is a lot of hatred of Palin coming from the McCain team.

Newsweek is promising more of this kind of thing. It's quality insider gossip.

Proposition 8

So it really sucks that Proposition 8 passed in California, eliminating gay marriage.

A lot of people are really upset about this and rightfully so of course. Cara at Feministe expresses her anger and disgust as well as anyone on the matter.

While I am disgusted as well, I want to be positive. Think about how far the gay rights movement has come. 10 years ago the idea of gay marriage having any chance to exist at all was crazy. Even 4 years ago, when Massachusetts starting allowing it, it was seen as out of left field. 15 years ago when I was in college it was difficult to be gay, even in Eugene.

A lot has changed.

A lot of work needs to be done.

Josh Marshall suggests that Prop 8 passed because African-American voters who came out for Obama also voted yes. There's no question that there are huge problems with homophobia within the black community. I hope Obama makes this a priority. It's sad that what leads to a great historic victory can also lead to a devastating defeat that takes rights away.

And certainly people in states less liberal than California and Massachusetts are banning gay marriage.

But the times are changing. Huge progress has been made in 15 years. Young people, even many young evangelicals, support equal rights for the LGBT community. This is going to happen. It might take another 20 years, but damn it will happen and in our lifetimes too.

UPDATE: To add a little evidence to this argument, note that in 1993 44% of Americans thought gays should be able to serve openly in the military. A recent poll shows that number rising to 75%. This is real progress.

So I'm upset about this too (and it is one of the biggest bummers of the night) but history is on our side.

This also serves as another excuse to mention how much I hate ballot measures, which almost invariably appeal to the worst American tendencies.

Barack Obama, 44th President of the United States

I still can't say it without breaking down a bit.

Wrote this for Global Comment before bed last night:

Barack Obama will be the 44th President of the United States.

To type those words brings back the euphoria of the first few minutes after the words flashed on the blurry screen of the projector lugged in at the last minute to update all of us at the Northeast Philly headquarters on the results.

I have been awake for many, many hours.

I woke up at 4:30 AM to arrive at my staging location by 5:30.

Like millions of others across the country, I spent the whole day working. I watched the polls, knocked on doors, brought coffee and donuts to poll workers, and I talked to hundreds of voters.

There was a little high every time someone smiled at us and said, “I voted this morning!”

There was an even bigger high when the pollworkers told us that turnout was double what they normally see.

There was an almost unbeatable high when our state was called for our candidate almost as soon as the polls closed.

But nothing comes close to the feeling we got when, in a roomful of people who’ve worked those same long hours, the screen told us: Barack Obama will be the 44th President of the United States.


READ THE REST (because you love me)

proud to be American. what a weird feeling.

Non-election news?

Mexico's Minister of the Interior was killed in a plane crash yesterday, along with a number of other people. The plane crashed right into traffic in Mexico City, crazy to think about. This is a big deal, the Ministerial position is sort of second only to the president in influence, and the holder of this position definitely has a lot of power. While Mouriño was a pretty controversial figure in Mexico, this is likely a huge blow to the Calderón government.

Victory



Hi guys. I've been up for 23 hours now, and I'm going to get a tiny bit of sleep before work tomorrow morning.

I am delirious, but more importantly, insanely happy and proud of all of us. We did it.

Now the real work begins.

(I can't even type President Barack Obama without my face breaking into a grin. I love this night.)

Wow

Words cannot express what I feel right now.

This is one of the greatest nights of my life. Watching that acceptance speech was amazing. See Jesse Jackson crying in the crowd was incredibly powerful.

And I can't express enough how amazing it is that we just elected an African-American president. In this nation. As a historian who knows way too much about the depths of American racism, I am absolutely amazed that we have reached this point. I'll have more on this tomorrow, but I can't even comprehend this fact. I never thought we would see this in my lifetime, or if we did, it would have to be a Republican.

President Obama. That has one hell of an amazing ring to it.

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Finally

Too much emotion.....



........I can't make any phone calls now, presumably because every last person in New York City is calling everybody they know, and the network is flooded.

This is quite possibly the best night of my life, and I can't imagine anything that would rival it (maybe an Indians World Series).

I never thought I'd say this, but I gotta say: Sarah Palin was right.

There will be time down the road to say "but what about...", "what if...", "can we", or "now what."




For now, let's just celebrate, toast the voters, and above all......




toast Barack Obama.

Thank you, Barack. From the deepest part of my heart and soul, thank you.


.......UPDATE: I just saw on TV Jesse Jackson absolutely bawling. Seeing one of the guys who was there when Martin Luther King Jr. was killed seeing this finally was just overwhelming. I'm inexpressably happy for him and all those who fought for civil rights, regardless of the form of the battle or the generation they are a part of.

.....UPDATE II: I wanted to go to Harlem pretty badly (only a few blocks from where I live), but I wanted to see Obama's speech more, so we ended up at a local bar. Honestly, if Obama went on television every night with speeches, I'd watch TV every night.

My wife says the atmosphere here in New York, with people cheering on the streets, smiling, and honking car horns, is like winning the World Cup (and she should know - Brazil does have 5 championships). I joke with her that the difference is that when Brazil wins a World Cup, it doesn't determine if a global power is going to end up getting in more wars or not.

OK - it's relatively late, and the booze has flowed freely tonight (to make up for the despondent drunkenness I had to endure in 2004). This is truly a historic, monumental, amazing night, and with all the potential for hyperbole aside, I can honestly say that for the first time in my life since I was old enough to ask politically pointed questions and be sarcastic and cynical, I actually feel really pretty good about where this country could (not necessarily will - that's up to Obama, now) go.

An awesome, awesome, awesome night. Thanks to all those who helped make this happen (I'm particularly looking in your direction, Sarah.....)

It's Almost Too Easy....

Shorter David Broder: "Obama only won because McCain thanklessly and selflessly decided not to be a secret racist prior to this election."

Verbatim David Broder: "In what history may record as [Obama's] singular achievement -- dealing with the classic American dilemma of race -- he had the largely unappreciated help of his opponent, John McCain, who simply ruled out covert racial appeals used by politicians of both parties in the past."

I look forward to 4-8 years of watching these morons try to pull this crap while Obama can brilliantly snark away.

'Nuff said - there's more coverage to watch, and more beer to drink.

(h/t to Michael Berube).

Some quick notes on Election Day Observations in Southern New Mexico

I arrived at my first polling place at 6am in Las Cruces to watch the opening. Out of 4 poll workers, 1 had had training, and the other 3 had only been called to work the day before. Needless to say, it was a little chaotic, and the polls opened about 15 minutes late. The voters were a little hostile and yelling at the workers, but they finally were able to vote. When a person gets a ballot, they also get a voter permit card that has the ballot number and the voters number on the list of registered voters. At this particular precinct, the poll workers were asking the voter's party identification to write on the permit card as they inserted the ballot into the voting machine. It was obvious the voters were a little taken aback by this, but didn't really question it. It is definitely not allowed to ask a voter's partisanship like this. Very weird.


Most of the precincts I visited throughout Doña Ana County and Las Cruces were very slow, without very much activity. Its not all that surprising because early voting turnout was so high here, but I'll have to see if that was the trend across the county and the state. I've had very little communication with others throughout the day.

The most interesting place I went to was Sunland Park, which is a heavily Latino area next to El Paso. The first precinct we attended had a table of Obama campaign people in front of the polling place handing out sample ballots to voters with all the Democratic candidates filled in so the voters could use the sample ballot as a guide. We saw a number of voters actually use these ballots in the pooling booth. There was also another team of Obama campaign people helping voters find their precinct if they were at the wrong precinct. Unfortunately, in the heavily Spanish-speaking areas we attended, there were a high number of provisional ballots being filled out. I'm not really sure what was going on, but there seemed to be a lot more confusion going on in these precincts in finding the correct voting location. The Republican challenger inside the Sunland Park precinct said he was waiting for a buss load of people to come into the site, so he could go out and start taking down the license plates as a form of intimidation. He said it works, because a lot of voters in the area are scared of people recording information about them. 

In the second precinct in Sunland Park, there was not much going on, but as we were leaving, My colleague and I were harassed by a supposed chairwoman of the New Mexico Democratic Party. She said she had received reports of two men going around precincts asking voters to sign forms and talking to voters, something we were definitely not doing. It was a fairly long ordeal, and I understand her concern. It does demonstrate the level of tension in this community, and two white guys walking around with forms probably looked suspicious to somebody. We had heard stories about the last election from some Obama people of campaigners being arrested by the police, even though they were far enough away from the precinct. 

I'm tired and need a drink.

Burn in Hell Jesse Helms

Jesse Helms is rolling over in his grave. Not only is Barack Obama going to be president of the United States, but Kay Hagan just won his old Senate seat.

Ha!

And the Marathon of Pundit Vacuity Has Begun

Some guy (I have no clue who) on CBS (I don't have cable) just pointed out that, with Liddy Dole's expected loss, this will be the first time in 50 years that there will be nobody named "Dole" or "Bush" holding a public national office. Ladies and gentlemen, we have an early contender for most "so what?" statement of the night.

Consider this an open thread on stupid punditry (or anything else) for the night.

Election Night/Drinking Time

Just opened my first beer, for no other reason than I wanted one.

Here's hoping tonight is a night of toast after toast.....

Hilarious

Roland Martin totally calls out James Carville for demanding that Howard Dean resign over the 50 state strategy.

Carville in return comes across as a petulant asshole and fails to defend his position.

Fuck you Skeletor.

Historical Image of the Day


















2 images today.

I know that everyone is focusing on the 2008 election. But I also know that the election closest to your heart is 1840 when William Henry Harrison beat Martin Van Buren. The parallels to today are so obvious that I am not even going to name them.

From the Campaign

Hi from ward 31 in philly!

I'm sitting in my car because it's raining a bit. My polling place had a line for the first time ever when it opened at 7, and it's already had more people than usually vote there all day--and it's noon. 8 more hours.

It's the same story all over the ward, and in other neighborhoods there are lines around the corner.

Philadelphia is an Obama city, but this ward is Republican. Yet, if you've checked my twitter, you'll see that even the Republican committeeman at this polling place implied he might've voted for Obama.

In other words, things feel really good on the ground.

Don't forget to vote now.

Republicans in the Cabinet?

In what we can expect to be many acts of High Broderism between now and January 20, there has been an outburst of discussion of Republicans in Obama's cabinet.

Why?

Obama has talked enough about bipartisanship that he needs at least one Republican in there. Give someone a minor position. The example here is W in 2001, when he kept Norman Mineta in the cabinet. He could say that he was bipartisan while isolating a respected Democrat in a marginal department.

But of course, pundits and writers are already talking about how Obama needs a Republican in State and/or Defense. Even people I respect are saying these things. Spencer Ackerman is calling for Robert Gates to stay on until Wesley Clark or Anthony Zinni become eligible (by law one cannot be the Secretary of Defense until they have no longer been on-duty for 10 years). More expectedly, John Judis is saying crazy High Broderist things like asking Mitt Romney to lead a bipartisan health care task force, keeping Gates on, and getting Governor Terminator to work on environmental issues.

Um, no.

Part of this election is a rejection of Republican foreign policy. Keeping Robert Gates at Defense? Are you freaking kidding me. Rob points out one reason why this should not happen. Colin Powell at State? After his performance at the UN in 2003? Forget about it. I guess Chuck Hagel isn't terrible but why go there?

Democrats do not need to cede foreign policy and defense matters to the Republicans. One of the refreshing things about policy in this election is that Obama has put together a team of foreign policy people that add up to the first real coherent Democratic stand on the issue other than "no" since the 1960s. We can lead on these issues and we don't need to kow tow to either Republicans or the punditocracy on these matters.

Swiftian

I am proud to have been linked to in the Jon Swift post about why McCain will win the election.

Among the reasons for his sure victory:


Just as Obama Girl couldn’t manage to vote in the primary because she had to wash her hair or something, most young people won’t be able to summon up the energy to get out of bed or stop playing their video games long enough to show up and vote for Obama.

The McCain campaign has finally hit on a strategy that works: scaring the Jews. It’s a sure-fire strategy because jittery Jews are the most easily frightened people on earth. Boo! If you’re Jewish, you probably jumped just reading that last sentence. It really doesn’t take much. All you have to do is insinuate that somebody knows somebody who might possibly be anti-Semitic and Jews will stampede in the other direction.

Palin has had a strange effect on American men. It’s hard to describe the secret of her allure. According to Kathleen Parker, it's why McCain picked her in the first place: "McCain took Palin to his favorite coffee-drinking spot down by a creek and a sycamore tree," she writes. "They talked for more than an hour, and, as Napoleon whispered to Josephine, ‘Voila.’ One does not have to be a psychoanalyst to reckon that McCain was smitten." In The New Yorker Jane Mayer describes how a group of influential conservative men became putty in Palin's hands after they met her on a cruise. Rich Lowry may have articulated it best when he wrote after the debate, "I'm sure I'm not the only male in America who, when Palin dropped her first wink, sat up a little straighter on the couch and said, 'Hey, I think she just winked at me.' And her smile. By the end, when she clearly knew she was doing well, it was so sparkling it was almost mesmerizing. It sent little starbursts through the screen and ricocheting around the living rooms of America." Ultimately, I think many men will end up voting for Palin and her running mate because men tend to think with their hearts more than their brains. When men see Palin, they can’t describe the effect she has on them; they just know their palms get sweaty and hearts start beating faster.

Hilarious.

Dixville Notch

The vote in one town doesn't matter.

However, Dixville Notch, New Hampshire fulfilled its usual role today as the first place to vote in the nation.

In 1988, Bush beat Dukakis in Dixville Notch 34-3. In 2004, W beat Kerry 19-7.

Today, Obama beat McCain 15-6.


If Dixville Notch at all represents shifts among small-town voters, this is going to be a very long night for McSame.

My Brain on Election Day

asdfdsao fpafwer32`12343rwer wer-19=380-423057234513413413742374asdf asdfsdfadsfasdfsdfadsfasd fasd fsdfwf&(*%^&$^##^%#())_()^*(%hdsaf sdfs sfsdfisdfasdfsdf


Yes, I am totally nonfunctional today.



asdf adsofiuwe90ru19013413r af
dwfdsfwfFDAJFAD JFE'Ppjoafjfefgp

If You Haven't Already Voted, What Are You Doing Reading This Blog???!!?!?!?

To echo Sarah, go vote today!!! Be it for Barack Obama, John McCain, Charles "Chuck" Baldwin, Cynthia McKinney, Brian Moore, Ralph Nader, Bob Barr (and his moustache), or somebody else - just please go vote. I know it's cliche, but as somebody who's spent a fair amount of his time reading about dictatorships, voting is something Americans really do take for granted, so get out there and exercise the right our government still hasn't denied us.

And in the anecdotal portion, I spent only a half-hour in line this morning waiting to vote (though it was 7AM), and it went quickly and smoothly (apparently, in New York, we don't vote on ballot initiatives or tax issues or sherriff or anything with the general election - maybe that will come next year with the mayoral and city council elections). There were no problems, everybody seemed to be in a good mood, and some election monitors even showed up to see how things were going. And I realized that this was the first time I ever voted on Election Day (previously having voted absentee in 2000 and early voting in 2004), making today even more exciting.

Anyhow - VOTE!

Monday, November 03, 2008

Counting Absentee Ballots in Albuquerque






Here are some images of the counting of Absentee ballots in Albuquerque from this afternoon. There aren't very good because I was not allowed to take pictures in the actual area where people were working. In the second picture, you can see a bunch of people behind a fence. That is where the four machines that count the absentee ballots are located. The county hopes to finished counting all the ballots tonight, and as you can see, this is a massive operation. 

I've heard from several friends that absentee ballots aren't counted unless the race is close, or that they don't count them until the election is over. I'm not sure these somewhat crummy pictures are convincing evidence that these rumors are false, but they are.

New Mexico's Election Process

(This is long, but I need to make up for not posting in the last several weeks!)

Last week I attended two poll worker training sessions in preparation for some Election Day observations I will be involved in tomorrow. I thought it might be interesting to outline exactly how elections are run here in New Mexico, since I’ve come across a lot of people recently that are not only really skeptical of the election process, but just have no idea what happens. While my training was limited to Bernalillo County (where Albuquerque is located), the process across the state is theoretically similar and the same training materials are used state-wide. The only exception is some minor changes to the process in Albuquerque because of its size. Tomorrow, I will be part of a team observing elections in Doña Ana County, New Mexico, which includes Las Cruces, Hatch, Anthony, and a number of other small towns in Southeastern New Mexico, and I hopefully will be able to do some live blogging about what we are observing and how much the observed process differs from how the election should be run. There will also be teams observing in Albuquerque, Santa Fe, and Farmington, so if anything interesting happens in those areas we will be in touch and I hope to be able to blog about those areas as well.

Background

In New Mexico we have paper ballots where we fill in a bubble for each choice we make. A sample ballot can be seen here. It is a lot like a scan-tron, and after an individual fills in their ballot, it is then fed into the voting machine, called an M-100 Voting Tabulator. The voting machine is nothing more than a big metal box, with a scanner on the top. There is an electronic zip disk (yes, they actually still use zip disks) that includes the code for each precinct inserted into each scanner, which allows the scanner to read the ballot and record the votes correctly. When the machine is turned on, a zero tape is printed out that shows all the counts for each race and ballot question are at zero. When the polls close, another tape is printed out that includes the results for all races and questions.

At each precinct, there is an election board that is made up of a presiding judge, and a number of poll workers. Each election board is supposed to be balanced between Republicans and Democrats. I attended both the presiding judge training, and regular poll worker training.

Prior to Election Day and Opening the Polls

Presiding judges are required to attend a 4-hour training session prior to each election. The training I attended included about 100 people, and I would say about half of them had served before as presiding judges. The training session includes a video presentation of how to set up and take down a precinct, what the voter ID law is in New Mexico, what to do in case of emergencies or problems in the precinct, how to deal with provisional ballots and absentee ballots, and how to use the M-100 voting machine and the automark system, which is a voting assistance machine for those with special needs. There was a wide variety of people at the training, definitely on the older side, but also a lot of people in their 30s and 40s. Poll workers attend a two-hour training that is very similar to the presiding judge training, but since poll workers have less responsibilities than the judges, there is less to cover. Presiding Judges are given a list of the poll workers that will be working at their precinct during the training, and are supposed to be in contact with the poll workers prior to Election Day. It does seem that for the most part, judges and poll workers do not know each other before Election Day, since a lot of people do not actually work in their own precinct.

Much of the training session was taken up by question and answer, and some venting by a lot of the judges. Our voter ID law does not seem to be very popular among the presiding judges and poll workers, so it will be interesting to see how this is applied. (You can read the Voter ID law here. Also the provisional ballot process, which allows anyone to fill out a ballot on election day regardless of registration status or if they are in the correct location, is complicated and seems to be fairly disliked by election workers. Most provisional ballots end up getting thrown out, but it does allow for a more open electoral process and is a good safeguard against inadvertently disenfranchising a voter because of a clerical error or some other problem. It is somewhat of a problem that lot of the judges, and poll workers as well, seem to only grudgingly accept their responsibility to apply the law as it is supposed to be, and will likely mean that the application of Voter ID laws and the allowance for filling out a provisional ballot is not going to be universally applied across New Mexico. But, I’ll get to see this first hand tomorrow, so hopefully I’m wrong!

In the week leading up to the election, county clerks begin delivering the voting machines  and polling booths to each individual precinct. In Bernalillo County, the Sunday before the election, presiding judges pick up the ballots and other administrative materials they need to set up their precinct on Election Day. All of this material is received in a locked ballot box, which they have to bring with them to the precinct. Polls open at 7am, so all judges and poll workers have to show up at 6am to set up the precinct. Setting up the precinct involves setting up tables, putting together the polling booths, turning on the voting machine, and setting up the Automark system. They also are required to post all the typical signs one sees at a precinct on Election Day. No campaigning is allowed within 100 feet of the polls, and the poll workers are required to determine where that designated 100 feet is, and to make sure throughout the day that that barrier is maintained.

Election Day Voting

Once polls open at 7am, voters identify themselves and sign off on the list of registered voters. Poll workers also have a second list that is checked off by a second poll worker, to ensure accuracy and help balance out the number of voters with the number of ballots cast at the end of the day. After a voter has identified themselves, they receive a ballot and a voter permit card. The voter permit card includes the ballot number and the voter’s number on the registration list. Each ballot is numbered, but this portion of the ballot is torn off prior to being given to the voter. The numbering of the ballots and the voter permit cards is necessary in order to make sure ballots are not lost and all ballots are accounted for at the end of the day. As long as the ballot stub with the number is torn off, there is no way to attach a permit card to a ballot after the fact to figure out how any individual person voted. After a person has filled out their ballot, the voter is supposed to put the ballot in the voting machine. Poll workers are allowed to help in inserting the ballot, but only if asked. Once a ballot has been given to a voter, no poll worker is supposed to touch it unless asked for help. This also applies to voters who make a mistake on their ballot and need a new one, those who vote provisionally, and those who fill out an in-lieu-of absentee ballot. However, I’ve heard there is wide variation in how poll workers handle ballots, and it has already happened to one person on our observation team where a spoiled ballot was “disappeared” by a poll worker in an early voting location, even though the voter him or herself is supposed to place it in a special envelope and seal it.

Closing the Polls

Polls close at 7pm. Poll workers are supposed to identify the last person in line who was there by 7pm and allow those still in line to vote. After all votes have been cast, poll workers print out the results from the voting machine, and start breaking down everything that had been set up at the beginning of the day. A number of different results tapes are printed out and mailed to different locations, including the county clerk, the secretary of state, and the district attorney. The results are also supposed to be posted at the precinct in a visible location so voters can come and see how their precinct voted. The ballots are taken out of the M-100 voting machine and placed into a locked ballot box. There are two keys to the ballot box, and once it is locked at the precinct, each key is mailed to a different location and cannot be opened without a court order. Any provisional ballots, in-lieu-of ballots, and absentee ballots that were handed in at a precinct are not supposed to be placed in the ballot box, but in previous elections they were, which really delayed the election process in New Mexico because a number of court orders were required to open up ballot boxes. In the trainings, the trainers really stressed not to put anything in the ballot box besides ballots from the M-100, so hopefully it is less of a problem this time around.

Throughout the day, there may be a number of ballots that were unreadable by the M-100. In some cases, voters made a mistake on their ballot and voted twice for a single race, and so the machine rejected the ballot. Voters are allowed to fill out a new ballot if they want to, but in some instances they refuse. These ballots are placed in a special slot in the M-100 machine and have to be hand-counted at the end of the night after the polls close. In this election, the hand-counting tally sheets are six pages long. Hand-counting ballots is extremely time consuming and much less accurate than machine counting. However, these ballots are counted at the precinct, and the results of any hand-counted ballots are delivered to the county clerk on election night as well. (They are, however, not posted at the precinct along with the machine results).

After the polls have been closed, the machine turned off, and all ballots counted, the poll workers have to balance out the number of voter signatures on the registration list, double-check it against the second registration list, and make sure the number of voters matches the number of ballots counted by the machine, plus hand-counted ballots. They also have make sure the number of voter permit cards matches the number of voters and ballots. Any remaining unused ballots are to be destroyed on site, after the numbered stubs are removed. The ballot stubs are saved to account for all ballots that were provided to each precinct. The poll worker trainings really did not emphasize saving the ballot stubs, and the printed training materials do not mention retaining these stubs. It is an important part of the process to make sure ballots do not end up missing.

The presiding judge is then required to take the ballots to the county clerk, where all the paperwork is checked over by county clerk employees to make sure everything is in order. In Albuquerque, there are drop zones across the city where judges take the ballots, but I think in most other places, the ballots are returned to one central location where the ballots are stored.

Feel free to ask questions in the comments, I'm sure I left out a lot!

 

Election Season Anecdote and the Future of the GOP

Saturday afternoon, I went down to our local grocery store (a very fine store that has been family-owned in Redlands for generations). I parked my car, and was locking the door when a middle-aged white guy in one of those dreadful Scion breadbox cars was inching past me in the lot. It was a very pleasant afternoon in Southern California, so he had his window down. Said middle-aged white guy must have seen the Obama sticker on my car, because he looked at me and proceeded to instruct me to be a "real American" and vote McCain-Palin. I was taken aback and asked him to repeat himself, thinking that I had misheard him. I thought he could have been making a joke, so I smiled. He was not, in fact, joking. He got rather angry and said something about not being patriotic and that no real American would vote for Obama.

Many of you that know me can attest to the fact that I am not a violent (or even angry) person. Unfortunately, I was so angry I could only come up with the cursory, highly uncreative "fuck you" response, but the guy kept yammering on. Finally, I walked closer to car and told him to get out of the car and say it all again. He told me to fuck off and called me a "fag" and drove out of the parking lot.

Seriously? What happened to reasonable Republicans? I know they are out there, but the most vocal wing of their party is really ruining that party's party, so to speak. We've seen the hateful, disgusting speech and actions at the McCain rallies, the public recognition that ensuring all Florida voters get to vote will be McCain's undoing in the state, and public pining for the Bradley Effect by McCain surrogates.
Politics are ugly, and there are certainly over-the-top Obama people out there-- but come on. This incarnation of the GOP-- this "win-at-all-costs", "backs against the wall" kind-- this could end up being worse than the Bush GOP, and I shudder to think of what a Palin-led GOP would look like in the future.

Is it Tuesday yet? Maybe then I can go to the grocery store without being hassled.

Election Predictions

With a day to go, here are my election predictions:

Obama 356
McCain 182

Of the contested states, I have Obama winning Nevada, Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, and in a bit of a surprise, North Dakota. There hasn't been a lot of polling of North Dakota but what there is suggests a real chance for an Obama win.

I do have McCain holding on by tight margins in Arizona, Missouri, Montana, Indiana, and Georgia. I don't think West Virginia will be particularly close at all.

Senate: Democrats pick up 8 seats. I do think Franken will seal the deal in Minnesota although it is hard to say.

I also think that Saxby Chambliss will win a plurality but fail to win 50%, forcing a runoff against Jim Martin in December, a race that will be for the 60th Democratic seat.

I really don't see the Kentucky or Mississippi races falling our way.

House:

Democrats pick up 23 seats. I don't necessarily buy the huge gains some are hoping for. People seem to be relatively satisfied with their own representative, even as they hate Congress as a whole. There will be some gains, but not overwhelming.

Liveblogging the Election

To build on Sarah's post below, I'll probably be liveblogging the election obsessively as I freak out not only about the presidential race but also every Senate and House race. And probably a bunch of ballot measures around the country and local Texas races.

So I hope you'll join me in comments.

I'll probably try to play around with all this new-fangled technology Sarah is talking about too, both to see what she is saying and to try and comprehend what the kids are up to these days.

Historical Image of the Day


George W. Bush signing the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.

In case you needed another reminder of why Republicans suck.

Sunday, November 02, 2008

Election Time!

I don't think that anyone who reads this blog needs a reminder to vote on Tuesday, if you haven't already, but just in case you need one: DO IT.

I probably won't be updating much because I'll be out knocking on doors and hanging out at the polls watching for shenanigans. I hope you'll be doing the same. Especially if you're a lawyer or legal type. They always need more people to ensure people can vote.

Also, go download Greg Palast's "Steal Back Your Vote" investigative comic, because Palast is my hero and protecting our democracy is both his and my passion.

I'll try to toss things up on Tumblr as they happen, and no doubt will be twittering.

If there was still any doubt about Palin’s cluelessness...

It’s ironic that after all her disastrous interviews, and catastrophic media appearances, it takes a prank phone call three days prior to Election day to rub in the fact that Sarah Palin is absolutely clueless about everything.

If you haven’t seen the youtube video of a prank call made to Palin by a Canadian comedian pretending to be French president Nicolas Sarkozy, you must.

Setting aside the fact that Palin’s staff was careless enough to put this call through (as Biden said, the same people who failed to vet Palin failed to vet this phone call), the 6-minute video is riddled with traps, ALL of which Palin fell for.

When the comedian refers to singer, Steph Carse as the Prime Minister of Canada, Palin nods along. She clearly does not know that it is Stephen Harper who is the Prime Minister of one of the countries that borders the state of which she is the executive (note that Canada abutting Alaska is part of her claim to foreign policy experience – along with being able to see Russia from her house).

When the comedian asks her about the PM of Quebec, “Mr. Richard Serroi” who is “so next to him,” Palin acknowledges that she has enjoyed working with Candian officials – Canadian officials, whose names she is curiously unaware of. Serroi is a radio personality in Quebec, a Canadian province that is nowhere near Alaska, and whose head of state is Premier Jean Charest.

Palin also seems totally unaware of jabs such as the fake Sarkozy’s statement that he could see Belgium from his house, and is curiously nonchalant to his admission that his wife is hot in bed!

In addition to being appalled at her ignorance, I find it disturbing that she laughs – almost callously - at the prankster’s clearly sarcastic remark about his love of killing animals.

"I just love killing those animals. Mmm, mmm, take away life, that is so fun," he says, and Palin snickers.

Besides all of that, how do you not know that the President of France wouldn’t just decide to pick up the phone and make small talk with a likely (god forbid) veep candidate in the US?

The McCain camp, of course, had to put a positive spin on this gaffe as well. "Governor Palin was mildly amused to learn that she had joined the ranks of heads of state, including President Sarkozy and other celebrities, in being targeted by these pranksters. C'est la vie," Palin campaign spokeswoman, Tracey Schmitt said.

That Palin is a national joke was obvious before this. That she enjoys being a national joke is clear now.

Saturday, November 01, 2008

Obama and the Democratic Congress

I pretty much disagree with Matt Bai's article about Obama not being able to control a Democratic Congress. He writes:

If recent history is any guide, however, Obama would need more than raw numbers in his favor. Congressional majorities are, in fact, a lot like corporate profits; they exist on paper, but that doesn’t mean they’re actually there when you need them. Carter, a reformer who won in an equally anti-Republican year, inherited a 23-seat majority in the Senate and a 149-seat advantage in the House — and accomplished little. Working with a narrower majority, Clinton barely passed a budget and then failed to win approval for his health care plan before losing Congress altogether. George W. Bush saw his one-seat Senate majority disappear almost immediately when a member of his own party, Jim Jeffords, defected.

The problem for all three presidents was, in a sense, more cultural than ideological. Carter, Clinton and Bush were all former governors who had not spent enough time in Washington to take the subway without a map; they were of the same parties as their Congressional allies but not of the same club. Each arrived in Washington assuming he’d earned the right to dictate the governing agenda to his party’s leaders, and each soon learned that entrenched Congressional chairmen aren’t especially impressed by inaugural balls. Such outsider presidents tend to display a remarkable indifference to the electoral needs and insecurities that can lead legislators to abandon a president of their own party. In retrospect, for instance, it’s hard to imagine why Clinton pursued a vote on his anti-crime bill, which included new restrictions on handguns, in August 1994, just three months before a lot of Southern and Western Democrats had to face the voters in their districts. A lot of them lost at least partly as a result, and the lesson that Congressional Democrats took away was that Clinton’s vaunted political instincts didn’t extend to helping them.


The problem with this analysis is that it is a facile look at the past. There is a huge difference between Carter and Clinton on the one hand and Obama on the other. Carter and Clinton had Democratic majorities, but those majorities had significant numbers of old-style southern Democrats in them. The realignment of 1980-1994 essentially eliminated those seats. Today, almost all Democrats agree with the central agenda of the party. Bai is someone aware of this but says that the tide of Democrats is likely to bring in more conservative members. To some extent, this may be true. I'm sure that there will be a couple more Heath Shuler types in the House. But who in the Senate fits this description? Democrats are going to win at least 7 Senate seats and I can't think of one of these people who is a conservative. Kay Hagan? Maybe. That's it.

That's not to say that Obama won't have problems setting the agenda. But I think the structural problem that Bai bases his history on has largely disappeared.

Meet an Asshat: Texas Edition

I'm stealing AnthonyS' post title for this.

Sometimes you just run into asshats. The other day, I was eating lunch in my school cafeteria. I sit down in a booth with my New Yorker, ready to have a quiet lunch. But my attention is quickly captured by the booth next to me. In it were two frat jerkoffs and a middle-aged guy in a suit. At a small school like this, you at least know what everyone in administration looks like. So I knew this was not an administrator. Then I overhear this guy talking to the frat daddies about politics in a very insider way, discussing staffing and things like this. And I realize, this guy is a fucking congressman! I knew there was no way he wasn't a Republican, not sitting with these tools.

So I thought, who is this asshat? I thought for a minute that it might be my own asshat, John Carter. Carter is a real schmuck. I mean a real piece of crap. Exactly what you expect from a Republican congressman. But I thought he was older than this dude sitting next to me. I get back to the office and look up Carter and sure enough it was not him. Then I start playing around on the school website. Turns out that the asshat sitting next to me was Pete Sessions, Republican congressman from Dallas, who was speaking at Southwestern the next day. He's also an alumni of Southwestern, continuing our legacy of producing dickhead Republican politicians, of which John Tower is the most famous.

Sessions is a real piece of work. He's an energy freak and a core member of the Drill Baby Drill caucus. A tool for the oil industry, he's prefect for suburban white Texas. He's also a shill for the chemical industry, having introduced a number of bills looking to eliminate duties on chemical additives. The group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington also named Sessions of the 20 most corrupt congressmen in 2006. He is close to Jack Abramoff and in 2007 held a fundraiser in a Las Vegas strip club.

Class all the way here my friends.

What is really entertaining though is that Sessions comes from a whole family of asshats. His dad is William Sessions, who some of you might remember, was head of the FBI before Bill Clinton canned him for financial improprieties, including charging his home security system to the taxpayers and using a government airplane to fly to see his daughter.

I know I am supposed to be civil and all. But I can't actually see important Republicans without seething to the point of violence. I really can't stand them. I once quit a temp job I had because New Mexico Republican congresswoman Heather Wilson was showing up the next day to. promote the place as a model for privatized health care. Fearful that I would lunge at her with a pair of scissors, I quit. Likewise, I wanted to beat the living shit out of Sessions, just for polluting my lunch. I know this is bad. But these people are just so evil.

Interestingly though, Sessions admitted to the frat dudes he was with that the Republicans were going to lose 15 seats. I wonder how close to the mark he is. He was also fretting about employing all the staffers who are losing their jobs, much to the chagrin of the frat guys who were wanting jobs.

The Lamest Movie Recommendation Ever

I went and saw Charlie Kaufman's new film, Synecdoche, New York, last night, and I can unqualifiedly say that it is amazing, beautiful, mind-boggling, and everybody (or at least everybody who reads this blog) should go see it. I can't think of a film that ever appealed so directly to me and issues I've been dealing with personally before, and that has kept me thinking for anything more than 3 hours after I saw it (I'm still only now digesting and wrestling with portions of the film).

That said, there are so many parts of the film that I can't explain or figure out, with no clue sometimes what Kaufman was trying to do, that I'm rather puzzled. What's more, it's one of those films that strikes me as almost impossible to do justice in trying to explain it. So just trust me on this - everybody should go see this movie. It may be Kaufman's best (and strangest) work to date, up there if not better than Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.

Historical Image of the Day


Daddy Grace, founder of the United House of Prayer for All People, a revivalist (cult one might say) church that appealed to poor urban African-Americans in the early to mid 20th century.

He was also an early pioneer in the Sun Ra school of fashion.

Does Darren White Shave His Legs?


Not that it really matters I guess. But I certainly wouldn't expect it from the Bernalillo County sheriff who is running as a Republican to replace Heather Wilson in my old New Mexico district. White is the definition of Republican jerk and is about to have his hat handed to him by Martin Heinrich.

Over at Daily Kos, they put this picture up to highlight his ankle tattoo of Reagan's signature. Which is really creepy. And then I looked closer and saw a very smooth looking leg there.

Channeling Hunter S. Thompson

The McCain campaign, in its last throes, has proven itself to be nothing more than the last stinking gasp of the Right for power.

McCain has no message. He simply has people onstage ranting about "the gay" and dropping Muslim names in the vain hope that one will stick enough to carry him into the White House on a tide of fear, blood, and KKK robes. He has cobbled together a campaign from the worst bits of the Bush folks and the lobbyists who he claims to shun, picked a running mate out of a hat because she had a vagina, a special needs baby, and looked good chanting "Drill, baby, drill" in front of a crowd.

He's latched onto Joe the Plumber, a guy so grasping that he's already got a PR agent and is standing McCain up at rallies, to buy him some desperately needed working class cred after forgetting how many homes he had and after his party spent twice as much as most people make in a year on his running mate's wardrobe. Yet Joe the Plumber is just as phony as McCain.

McCain's doing worse than Bush for three reasons. One is obvious. The economy is crashing around us, and there's been a Republican in the White House for the past 8 years. Hell, McCain was running ahead of his brand for a while, until the real crisis hit.

Two is that during the debates, when Obama's numbers really started to rise, McCain looked petulant and sounded condescending and even rude. Americans might want a president they can relate to, but they damn sure don't want one who talks to 'em like they're stupid.

Three is, of course, that McCain has no message. He sold his soul, the one that used to win grudging respect from even the hardest lefties, in the past four years, caving on torture, on troops, on taxes. He has gone from being a soft-line pro-lifer to holding up Justice Alito as a paragon of virtue, gone from a man who lost a primary himself because of race-baiting and fear to a man who uses it and defends it.

I can't even begin to imagine what a McCain administration would actually look like, other than a full-on charge of all the worst elements in the Republican party--because even more so than Bush, that'll be who got him elected. The man that many Americans used to respect for standing up to his party will owe more to the racists, the homophobes, the Islamophobes, the pro-birth crowd, than any administration before him.

Nixon claimed that he governed because of a "silent majority." Reagan won over Democrats left and right with his charm. Even George W. Bush promised to be a "compassionate conservative" (though even now he's trying to sneak through more deregulation while our backs are turned).

McCain has promised us no such thing. He's shown us the America that he thinks he governs, and it's full of people who will lie about being assaulted by a black man, people who think having an Arabic middle name is reason to be lynched, and people who will never see a terrorist attack but who are more afraid of one than of what will happen when they can't afford health insurance because they've suddenly got to pay taxes on it.

Obama has run ad after ad based on his plan, including the other night's 30 minute ad buy. You might not agree with all of it, but it is out there for you to hear, for you to read. He has offered a vision of a country where we don't divide ourselves by red and blue, and he has won over states that no Democrat has dreamed of in decades. He has had no ethical scandals, no personal scandals, no steps out of line. He won all three debates.

Let's face it, if you vote for McCain now, you deserve what you get.

And it might feel like getting fucked with chainsaws.

(Cross-posted)

Also, I wrote something about the Obama infomercial for GlobalComment, if you're interested.

Friday, October 31, 2008

Studs Terkel, RIP

Saddest Halloween ever.

Terkel lived an amazing life. He was a strong voice for progressive politics through some great times and some terrible times. He was also an amazing chronicler of the times in which he lived.

But damn it, why couldn't he have lived a week longer to not only see an African-American elected president, but also a man from Chicago.

We should all make a toast on election night to the great Studs Terkel.

Say What?

A buddy-cop TV show? Written by the guy who penned "Fuck tha Police"? Truly, the power of money to make one forget one's previous radical stances never ceases to amaze me.

Thoughts on DeNixonification

I've been thinking quite a bit about Trend's post of a couple of days ago where he argued that Obama could start the deNixonification process in America.

I think there's something to it. It is possible although it is a long row to hoe.

But I also think it is worth considering this matter historically. There is the fact that Nixon semi-permanently damaged the American political system and body politic by his cynical acts. These actions were then built upon by other cynical politicians such as Reagan and Clinton and followed up with Congressional corruption and other acts that disillusioned a large section of the American public.

But there is also a sense of myth to this. To believe this entire construction, as I did before I really thought hard about it, is to ignore the Gilded Age. This is not the first time that the voting public has hated politicians and had no respect for the political system. Between about 1870 and 1901, most Americans had nothing but contempt for the people who ran their nation. This was a period of weak presidents and a strong but corrupt Congress. It was almost assumed by most Americans that if you were in Congress, you were probably taking bribes. And both parties essentially did whatever corporations wanted. I know this sounds nothing like the present.

The Credit Mobilier scandal of 1872 was just one of many times when the American public had little reason but to show contempt for their politicians. To be brief, the Union Pacific railroad decided to create a nonexistent company that they could funnel money to in order that they could be paid more for building the Transcontinental Railroad. They charged at least $23 million extra dollars for building the railroad, all of which went into the hands of executives and the politicians needed to make the scheme work.

Among the politicians implicated: Vice President Schuyler Colfax, future president James Garfield, future presidential candidate and powerful Maine senator James Blaine, and about 10 other congressmen and senators.

You can imagine the contempt and cynicism such actions, particularly when repeated time and time again, would have on the American public.

The difference between the 1880s and 2000s is that people still voted in large numbers, often over 80% turnout of the voting age population. And while I am not an expert on voting patterns of the Gilded Age, I believe this had more to do with local politics, patronage, and left-over feelings from the Civil War than any real belief that the person at the top of the ticket was worth a damn.

In 1901, Theodore Roosevelt came along and was a refreshing figure that took America in a new direction and really changed how Americans looked at the presidency and politicians in general. Don't get me wrong, I really despise TR. But he does show that a young, idealistic, activist president can make a difference in how people see politicians.

So why do we have this strong myth about everyone respecting politicians and looking up to the president before Nixon. Even during previous periods of high political engagement with low levels of corruption or other cynicism-producing activities, there was significant discontent with the government from large groups of the population.

Thus, I am wondering if this idea of a pre-Nixon past where everyone looks up to the president for leadership isn't a result of McCarthyism. The erasure from public space of real opposition to national leadership was a part of that plastic 50s world of Leave it to Beaver, Mom having Dad's martini ready when we walked in the door, and using your school desk to protect you from the atomic bomb. Of course this was the same world where we killed Ethel Rosenberg, where redbaiting was a part of life, when Mom was killing her own pain and boredom through Valium, and where Dad was the man in the gray flannel suit.

I think that this idea of a heroic political past is a specific historical phenomenon of the 1950s that doesn't really stand up to historical analysis. Like so much of baby boomer culture, this idea has been made normative and the lack of it defined as abnormal. But I would say that the last 35 years are at least as common in American history as the idealized Cold War world.

New Comment Record

For the second straight month, we have set a new comment record. Right now, with almost a day to go, we have had 583 comments this month. Last month we had 550.

I want to again thank all of our commenters. The real value of writing on the blog is entering into interesting conversations. So keep commenting! And for you lurkers out there, start commenting too!

I hope to have a similar post up at the end of next month.

Note: The final number was 604

Thursday, October 30, 2008

NFL @ Week 8--NFC (Anti-Cowboy Edition)

Since the Broncos had their bye week, I was able to have a stress-free day of football. That will end this week as they go up against Miami and their wildcat business. It could easily smash up Denver's "defense" so, if you play fantasy football and have Ronnie Brown on your team, I'd say this would be the time to play him. Enough about the Broncos, it's NFC time.

NFC EAST:
Though the Giants won their ugly, ugly game against the Steelers, Eli is looking like the Eli I remember from last year. He looks lost once again, like he just left the outhouse at night but dropped his flashlight down the hole. It makes me happy; the only good Manning is a bewildered Manning which, luckily we're getting from both conferences. Dallas may have won, but they look delightfully crappy in their game. Could I outperform Brad Johnson? I know I could outrun him, and that makes me like Tony Romo or, as they call him these days, Li'l Tony Pinkie.

NFC NORTH:
With Chicago and Green Bay tied up, this looks like a fun division going into the back half of the season. It's hard to believe that Kyle Orton is playing decent football, but there you have it. Since Aaron Rogers has been playing as well as he has (while hurt), I don't hear a lot of people discussing Old Man Brett. It's too bad, too, I'm missing hourly reports on what he ate for dinner last night. I hope it was meatloaf. Speaking of meatloaf, do you think that a really nicely done meatloaf could beat the Lions. Hell, even the Cowboys could probably beat the Lions if they tried and they aren't nearly as good as meatloaf.

NFC SOUTH:
Tampa should be stricken from the league for losing to the Cowboys in one of the worst games one could ever see. Jeff Garcia played fairly well, put just couldn't put away that crazy Dallas secondary. Maybe Gruden should consider signing receivers that are younger that fifty. I'm very happy that Carolina is doing well. I have no love for Jake Delhomme or Steve Smith or anyone else on that team besides Jonathan Stewart. I say that, if the Panthers win a playoff game, Stewart is way better than Marion Barber. GO DUCKS!!

NFC WEST:
How much worse can this division get? The bottom three teams in this division together could merely tie the top two in the East and that division features the Cowboys. I know...that level of bad makes me shutter, too. On a better note, I like seeing Mike Singletary freaking out. If there's a man who looks crazy, it's Singletary. I hope he gets into a brawl with his players sometime during the remainder of the season; it'll give me a reason to watch anybody in the division. And, look, the Seahawks won a game. Good luck to Jim Mora, Jr. net year, this is a team headed in the direction of the Bengals. But, you know, when you hire Cowboy castoff running backs, it's what you get.

Two quick final notes: 1) Fuck the Cowboys and 2) GO BRONCOS!!

Good Idea/Bad Idea

Good Idea: getting Joe Morgan off of ESPN's Sunday Night Baseball.

Bad Idea: replacing him with chauvinistic idiot Rick Sutcliffe.

I'm going to really explore the studio space this time and just say: WTF? You're going to replace an arrogant, uninformed, lazy, often-wrong, more-often-with-little-interesting-to-say announcer with another one who has the added bonus of being a sexist pig and occasionally broadcasting drunk? When you have way better broadcasters, like Orel Hershiser and Tony Gwynn? Both Hershiser and Gwynn are absolute revelations. I've been watching televised baseball games for about as long as I can remember, and it had been years since I'd ever heard a broadcaster say anything meaningful or teach me anything. Yet one Sunday night, Morgan was out, and Hershiser and Gwynn joined with Miller to "replace him." That night, I learned more about baseball, both generally and that particular game than I probably had learned in over 10 years. It was just amazing, and interesting, and fun! They bring back Hershiser periodically when Morgan can't make it (usually Hall of Fame weekend, which would eliminate Gwynn, too), but the idea of even just a Hershiser/Miller combo is so.......awesome!!! And yet the rumor is Morgan's replacement would be idiot-faux-redneck-sexist-uninteresting-self-absorbed RICK SUTCLIFFE?

Getting rid of Joe Morgan - GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Replacing him with (and continuing to employ) Rick Sutcliffe - BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD!!!!!!!!

Neo-Confederates for Obama?


















I don't even know what to make of this. There can't be that many self-identified Confederates who support Obama. But it is kind of mindblowing.

Via Civil War Memory

Why I Support Barack Obama

I thought I would give the all-important Erik Loomis presidential endorsement to one Barack Obama. Here's why.

1. I am excited about the imposition of sharia law on the United States.

2. I am a socialist.

3. I want to engage in class warfare against the rich.

4. I hate white people.

5. I want to commit race suicide.

6. I hate America.

7. I hate real Americans.

8. I want black men to rape white women.

9. I want God to damn America.

10. I want a secret cabal of ex-Weatherman to run the nation.

11. I want him to lead the anti-American wing of Congress into power.

12. I am an anarchist.

13. I am a member of the PLO and I want death to Israel.

I am sure there are other reasons too. As I continue to read right-wing media, I will remember what they all are.

Historical Image of the Day


Early 20th century intracervical and intrauterine pessaries.

I think the point of early 20th century birth control was to make it too painful to have sex.

And believe it or not, these devices were considered a significant improvement when they came out in the 1890s.

I realize that people might want to know about just what these things are. Here is the link to the article where I got the picture. Anyone on a university account should be able to access it for free. It's a great article on the history of birth control that I recommend for anyone. It's at least worth a look for the pictures. And if this link doesn't work, it is from the September 2000 issue of the Journal of American History.

The Decemberists Are Playing Where?

Tonight, I am seeing the Decemberists play.

In the gym at my school.

Why are they playing here? I have no idea. It is the only show they are playing in the South on this tour.

It's going to be like Elvis in the 50s when he used to play gyms in small towns all over the South. It's also going to be the weirdest show I've even been at. Not only am I skeptical about the acoustics of the gym, but I will be at a show with all of my students and some of my colleagues. I don't exactly expect anything to happen, but the atmosphere will be very strange.

I'm sure not complaining though! This will be the only thing happening in Georgetown all year.

Films for US History Survey Class

In the spring, I am teaching 2 sections of the recent U.S. history survey course, which here is defined as 1865-present. I should note that I think 1865 is a really bad time to end the first half of the survey. 1877 makes so much more sense. But whatever, this decision was probably made decades ago.

Anyway, I am including a film element in the course. I will be showing 6 films outside of class. The students must watch 4. The question is which films to show. It is so hard narrowing it down.

Here is what I am thinking right now.

1. A silent film of some sort. There are so many to choose from.

2. The Man Who Shot Liberty Valence.

3. Do the Right Thing

4. Red Dawn

5. Sullivan's Travels

6. The Day the Earth Stood Still

I think all of these films are good choices. However, I am not thrilled about the group as a whole for some reason. I'd like to have a good feminist film in there. But, and quite sadly, the canon of really good films about women's issues is slight in American film. No doubt this has a lot to do with the never-ending sexism of Hollywood. So something to fill that hole would be nice.

Anyway, I'd like to hear what suggestions you all might have, particularly if you think there are better choices that what is on the list above.

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Congratulations to the Philadelphia Phillies

Normally, I'd snark about whiny Philadelphia fans complaining about no title since 1983 and say something bitter like "Cleveland - 1964."


But a true, heartfelt congrats to the Phillies, their fans, and the city of Philadelphia. Every year, watching the sheer joy of the champions, I get a little tearful, imagining how great it must feel to be that team's fans (except, of course, when it's the Yankees - then the tears are for a completely different reason), and this year is no exception. I have no doubt if my beloved Indians ever win a World Series, I'll bawl like a baby, but as I can't do that this year, I'm happy for the Phillies and their fans. Congrats, too, to the players, and a particularly meaningful congrats to Charlie Manuel, beloved former Indians' manager - it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy not named Eric Wedge.

And again, Congrats to a great season and a World Championship.


And....Indians, 2009!!!!

Can Obama (or Anybody) "De-Nixon-ify" the U.S.?

Watching the Obama half-hour program tonight, I admit, I was pretty excited, not that he's going to be president (we still have to vote), but that there's any politician like him right now. I'm far from a giddy, emotive person, yet I've been excited about Obama, as a politician and then as a candidate, since his 2004 Democratic Convention address. I have repeatedly admitted that this is the first time in my life I've ever been excited about voting for anybody, and it will be the first time that I vote not against a candidate, but for one.

Tonight, hearing just the first two minutes, where Obama expressed how people still have hope, in spite of the economy and the wars and all the things facing the country, a thought crossed my mind. Is it possible that Obama, or any other politician, may be able to "de-Nixon-ify" the U.S. public's attitude towards politics? What I mean by this is, ever since Watergate, the public attitude towards American politics and politicians has been one of cynicism, skepticism, sarcasm, whereas that hadn't always been the case. For all the legacies Nixon left, no doubt the most impressive one to me is how his administration fundamentally shifted the way we the American people view politicians today.

Will it be that any politician, Obama or somebody else, might be able to reverse the damage that Nixon to our image of politics and politicians? What do others think - will Watergate be "undone" somewhere down the line? Or are we too partisan at this point for anything to be "undone" or improved?

The Hideous and Appalling Violence and Tactics Colombia's Paramilitary Groups Employ

I have written several times before about how paramilitary groups are responsible for a not-insignificant amount violence in Colombia. This article shows just how repulsive and appalling the paramilitaries' tactics are:

Prosecutors and human rights researchers are investigating hundreds of such deaths and disappearances, contending that Colombia’s security forces are increasingly murdering civilians and making it look as if they were killed in combat, often by planting weapons by the bodies or dressing the corpses in guerrilla fatigues.
With soldiers under intense pressure in recent years to register combat kills to earn promotions and benefits like time off and extra pay, reports of civilian killings are climbing, prosecutors and researchers say, pointing to a grisly facet of Colombia’s long internal war against leftist insurgencies.
The deaths have called into question the depth of Colombia’s recent strides against the rebel Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, and have begun to haunt the nation’s military hierarchy.

The whole article is depressing, but must be read. The U.S. tacitly supports these tactics via its financial support for the Uribe administration and its funding in the "drug war," whose funds often end up in the hands of these paramilitaries. Additionally, the complete failure to categorize such tactics as "terrorist" simply because Colombia is the U.S.'s biggest ally in the region, while nothing new, is no less inexcusable.

And then there's the issue of Uribe's leadership. He can insist he has nothing to do with these groups, and make public demonstrations of his "intolerance" for such actions, but they ring hollow, considering how closely paramilitary groups have been tied to Uribe's administration and friends, allies, and cabinet members.

This is in no way an apologia for the FARC or its actions; still, it has become increasingly clear of late that the FARC is far from the sole responsible agent for the civil war that plagues Colombia, and at times it seems the paramilitary groups are willing to go even further than the FARC in their "war." It's things like this that make me suspect that the disappearance of the FARC would not lead to the disappearance of violence in Colombia, in spite of what many both in and outside of Colombia may believe. As long as these groups act with relative impunity, and as long as there is a president who is unwilling to go after these groups in anything but a symbolic fashion when things get too appalling, there just doesn't seem to be a lot of hope to me that the violence in Colombia will go down anytime soon.

That's Not a Contradiction; That's a Failed Method

Just whittling my time away while waking up to coffee this morning, I read this meaningless, fluffy little article on the "reddest" and "bluest" cities in the U.S. Among the "reddest" cities, they included Lubbock, Texas (No surprise here; 3 of the 4 they listed were in Texas, and the fourth was Provo, Utah). One of the ways they described Lubbock was "contradictory," and one of their two examples of Lubbock's "inherent" contradictions? "The city has a high rate of teenage pregnancy but an abstinence-only sex education policy."

There's nothing contradictory about this, and these aren't mutually exclusive things. Time and again, people have shown that abstinence-only sex-ed doesn't stop teenagers from having sex. While I have no expectations for an article of this type, it's still really frustrating to me that this article can espouse abstinence-only as a valid form of sex-ed even while its own evidence (Lubbock) shows that the approach doesn't work. It's one thing for right-wing nutjobs who believe people and dinosaurs lived side-by-side and that the rapture is dependent upon Israel's independence to espouse this crap, but for an "article" of this sort to also blindly accept and puke up abstinence only as a valid program and remain befuddled as to why teenagers get pregnant so often in a city with such a program is just mind-numbing and counfounding.

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Totalizing Ethnic Stereotypes from How the Other Half Lives

My Progressive Era class tomorrow is reading Jacob Riis' classic 1901 expose of tenement housing, How the Other Half Lives. Figured I'd keep a tab of some of the more egregious totalizing ethnic statements.

1. "With all his conspicuous faults, the swarthy Italian immigrant has his redeeming traits. He is as honest as he is hot-headed."

2. "Like the Chinese, the Italian is a born gambler."

3. "The Jew runs to real estate as soon as he can save up enough for a deposit to clinch the bargain... But abuse and ridicule are not weapons to fight the Israelite with. He pockets them quietly with the rent and bides his time. He knows from experience, both sweet and bitter, that all things come to those who wait, including the houses and lands of their persecutors."

4. "The Irishman does not naturally take kindly to tenement life, though with characteristic versatility he adapts himself to its conditions at once."

5. "The Irishman's genius runs to public affairs rather than domestic life."

6. "The Chinaman does not rise at all; here, as at home, he simply remains stationary."

7. "Between the tabernacles of Jewry and the shrines of the Bend, Joss has cheekily planted his pagan worship of idols, chief among which are the celestial worshipper's own gain and lusts. Whatever may be said about the Chinman being a thousand years behind the age on his own shores, here he is distinctly abreast of it in his successfu scheming to 'make it pay.'"

8. "Ages of senseless idolatry, a mere grub-worship, have left him [the Chinese] without the essential qualities for appreciating the gentle teachings of a faith [Christianity] whose motive and unselfish spirit are alike beyond his grasp."

9. "It is not altogether by chance that the Chinaman has chosen the laundry as his distinctive field. He is by nature as clean as the cat, which he resembles in his traits of cruel cunning, and savage fury when aroused."

10. "Thrift is the watchword of Jewtown, as of its people the world over."

11. "The Czech is the Irishman of Central Europe, with all his genius and his strong passions."

12. "Cleanliness is the characteristic of the negro in his new surroundings, as it was his virtue in his old. In this respect he is immensely superior to the lowest of the whites, the Italians and the Polish Jews."

13. "The German has an advantage over his Celtic neighbor in his strong love for flowers."

I could go on.

Say It Ain't So, Coors!

I think I'm going to be sick.... The economic crisis has finally reached critical mass. Coors has decided to finally discontinue Zima for good. Stock up people, this amazing beverage will only be in stores until December and it will be gone for good. Oh, how I'll long for the days of listening to my Boyz II Men and Blues Traveller CDs while sitting down to a couple frosty, refreshingly clear malt beverages. I was going to tie a sweater around my neck and relive those days tonight, but now I'm too sad. Please, Coors, please restart the clear revolution. In these tough economic times, won't somebody think of America's thirst?

Diego Maradona to Coach Argentina

If this report (in Portuguese) is true, then Diego Maradona is going to be the new coach of the Argentine national men's soccer team (and as I write, it's now confirmed in English, here). It's daring and bold, to say the least, and no doubt a major PR move, guaranteed to get Argentina completely wound up about their team in a way they haven't been since Maradona was on the national team. He is an individual whose popularity is rivaled only by Evita. Imagine if Derek Jeter were a national hero rather than just a Yankee fan idol (with Jeffrey Maier as the Hand of God), and you only begin to get into the hero-worship of Maradona. When I was in Argentina, I seriously saw a soccer game on TV which was split-screen: on the left was the actual game, and on the right was a camera focusing on Maradona (in the stands that day) the entire game, just to capture his reactions.

This will be interesting, to say the least. Among other things, Maradona is a former coke fiend with an explosive temper whose most basic life events make national headlines in Argentina, where the population holds him as highly in Argentina as Evita. He could be great, though I hope not; I like him about as much as I like Jeter, and his fans are perhaps even more obnoxious (Maradona is not, never was, and never will be the greatest soccer player; that was Pele. You'd think a goal total of 307 vs. 1280 would be enough to settle that). I just don't see this working out, and if it's as embarassing for both the men's team and Maradona as I hope it will be, then this should be fun. However, if Maradona is successful, this will be really ugly, and Argentine fans will become even more intolerable than they already are (which is really hard to even begin to imagine).

...UPDATE: Given the coach and the player, guess we're virtually guaranteed of seeing this again...

Yuck

For my globalization class today, we are going to spend some time looking at mail order bride sites as part of our section on globalization and gender/sexuality.

I am going through this stuff in preparation. I feel gross just looking at it. The sites are so full of misogyny that I want to puke.

I think I need a shower.

Shorter Cultural Anthropology

Shorter cultural anthropology: "I am going to go, like, do some shit. And then I am going to write a book about it."

From, a crabby historian.

Historical Image of the Day


Marines, 1911

Interesting story here according to the Library of Congress site where I got it.

Evidently, these Marines were sent to Cuba as a way of intimidating Mexican revolutionaries by showing that the U.S. could move its troops around very quickly to deal with any problems on the border.

Random Video - Jackie Kennedy Campaigning in Spanish

With one week left to the elections, here's a fun little video from a campaign.

Monday, October 27, 2008

Drill, Baby, Drill

Evidently, many people believe that we can drill our way out of all of our problems.

And if the resources aren't here? Well, we'll drill the rest of the universe.

Starting with the moon according to Julia Levitt
.

She writes:

The New York Times reported last week that on October 22, India launched its first unmanned spacecraft to orbit the moon.

The craft is expected to remain in space for two years. During that time, it will do something undeniably cool:

prepare a 3-D atlas of the moon.

The other part of its mission, however, is something I find pretty unsettling:

and prospect the lunar surface for natural resources, including uranium, a coveted fuel for nuclear power plants, according to the Indian Space Research Organization.


Um, this is a really stupid idea. Not only is it logistically insane and prohibitively costly, but it is yet another example in humans' belief that there is always more where that came from and that technology will solve our problems.

But there's not more of a lot of things. And if we are seriously looking to find our resources from the moon, we are in very big trouble.

Tacos

Poncho Won Ton muses on tacos, possibly the greatest food in the world. We can only hope he continues to rate tacos around the Americas.

Seriously, what is better than a good taco? Anything? Anything at all?

I should also note that Poncho took a sound beating from me in fantasy football this week, so maybe getting some hits will ease him back from the edge.

Historical Image of the Day


School, Hohenwald, Tennessee.

I don't have a date on this but I would guess 1870s or 1880s. However, in backwaters like this, basing a guess on clothing can be tricky, so it could be later.